Message from @Ipod
Discord ID: 473582364023455746
Disengenuous to be honest.
Governments don't create welath, dum dum.
They take it.
Govs can create currency, however it comes at the cost of inflation. They can mitigate how long until the inflation kicks in. Technically in the period of creation until inflation that is creating wealth. But it all xatches up at some point.
That's not creating wealth, that's creating a currency that measures wealth.
eh its all relarive now since the *wealth* and *currency* isnt backed by anything of substance anymore.
Like Bitcoin <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
Capitalism doesn't create wealth, it destroys Poverty
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki It's not relative currently, it's just not being accurately tracked, which is going to bite us all on the ass when the fiat bubble bursts.
We've only been doing this for less than 100 years.
100 more! <:trumped:440551399772913674>
Its relative via buying and selling debt for the most part. Far from as concrete of when it was backed in precious metals and other forms
I'm not going to argue this with you, as you're a complete fuckwad on other topics.
1 wasnt arguing
2 the other topic is *drugs* which is a moronic subject.
3 your a moron in general
The person who is ignorant walks away from a discussion with an ad hom
Hmmmm, with that kind of money, you could have bought a nice rifle
But then he wouldn't be a democrat <:thronk:441701565607444482>
I don't guy why people buy expensive ass bags
because their friends know what bag it is
That's something I never understood about people. They always go for expensive goods in order to show off or some other nonsense, and then later on wonder why can't they afford nice things. It's because you spent all your money in order to show off on that other thing. It's a very interesting phenomena. Rich people on the other hand, those that make their money on their own, tend to wear the same clothes every day(meaning that they have multiple shirts that are the same and pants that are the same) and have goods that are on the much cheaper end of the spectrum
Rich people care less of what others think of them(still its important to be seen in positive light especially in a working environment,) and care more about what is going to get them ahead. Also they just tend to be better with handling their own money, which is why they spend less of it and are able to accumulate more of it. If the working and middle class persons rid some of their bad habits, they could find quite the increase of their wealth. Drugs, alcohol, excessive shopping, buying goods to show off, and the like. Just general good management would go a long way. Do note I'm not saying they'll become wealthy, just find a significant increase in their wealth.
it the peacoc syndrom, some peole want to show off the wealth and with it the power that come with it
Could very well be so, but it's more of a faux power than a real power. It's like showing off poisonous colors without really being poisonous lol.
Amount of single moms that are wearing tons a fake shit cus they just MUST look like ....Kim Kardashian or some other bint THOT
they are trying to thot in a atm to pay for her kids so she dont need to and go out and get even more shity kids
THAT'S not what welfare is FOR!
begone THOTS
geez I wonder why
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
how the fuck do you fuck this up
they talk about the great scandinavian or european systems all the time you'd think they'd be able to copy paste it
A year=??
Because those systems dont work with a population several times the size, the r&d which is several times thw amount of those countries, and the fact those countries use heavy taxes and in case like Norway oil to subsidize when our oil production is constantly cut.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki and the defense subsidy
True. The fact the european models include nearly no defense at the cost of the US picking the slack.
I was just considering what the scandinavian/euro models directly, i wasnt adding other facits
Something like only 25% of the US population are net-positive tax payers
(federally)
one way you can fix a part of the american healthcare system is to remve the monopol the big pharma did lobby for and open up the US for outside competition
> big pharma
>Outside competition in the US
Bruh.... There *is* no outside competition.