Message from @LordCaledus

Discord ID: 473884335607382076


2018-07-31 16:05:38 UTC  

whatever u wanna call it its evil

2018-07-31 16:05:39 UTC  

So should we rule by minority instead?

2018-07-31 16:05:43 UTC  

I request you demonstrate this Puma, because you can have roads without the taxation system or in a limited degree.

Toll systems, Toll Booths, Taxation based on elected apportionment if it's in the top 5 issues..

Yeah, basically before the rather illegal 16th amendment was passed and the fed reserve rose in that same year, which were cofacters in starting the great Depression my dad was born during the time of, but that's another story for a later period

2018-07-31 16:05:44 UTC  

We had that once

2018-07-31 16:05:48 UTC  

It's called oligarchy

2018-07-31 16:05:54 UTC  

No we should rule as individuals

2018-07-31 16:05:57 UTC  

in anarchy

2018-07-31 16:06:02 UTC  

So have tyranny by the mob

2018-07-31 16:06:07 UTC  

Otherwise known as the majority

2018-07-31 16:06:08 UTC  

how so?

2018-07-31 16:06:17 UTC  

@LordCaledus We should rule by votes, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..

2018-07-31 16:06:24 UTC  

That is literally what you always get without a state. The majority rule by mob rule

2018-07-31 16:06:36 UTC  

We would have enforcment agencies to uphold our rights

2018-07-31 16:06:36 UTC  

Not necessarily

2018-07-31 16:06:37 UTC  

It's majority rule either way

2018-07-31 16:06:41 UTC  

One is just less shitty

2018-07-31 16:06:52 UTC  

if anarchistic societal law structure were done well enough, democracies would be prevented

2018-07-31 16:06:53 UTC  

The enforcement agencies will enforce the will of whoever pays better

2018-07-31 16:06:59 UTC  

^

2018-07-31 16:07:09 UTC  

See: Blackwater.

2018-07-31 16:07:09 UTC  

Which is gonna be the majority

2018-07-31 16:07:27 UTC  

No you would choose which rights you want to be enforced and it would be mutiplied through out the country

2018-07-31 16:07:32 UTC  

Natural selection will push for more charitable ones over time if the people like them enough due to their own self interests influncing the choice and social darwisnism coming along

2018-07-31 16:07:35 UTC  

How would you do this?

2018-07-31 16:07:35 UTC  

it is possible

2018-07-31 16:07:37 UTC  

^

2018-07-31 16:07:39 UTC  

WHO chooses what rights?

2018-07-31 16:07:47 UTC  

The majority will choose

2018-07-31 16:07:51 UTC  

"We" is very... opaque.

2018-07-31 16:08:16 UTC  

With anarchy you cant enforce your sets of beliefs on others

2018-07-31 16:08:19 UTC  

The people with the money?

2018-07-31 16:08:22 UTC  

The majority?

2018-07-31 16:08:22 UTC  

in a state it happens all the time

2018-07-31 16:08:30 UTC  

Again, you'd do so by by votes, census, polls, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..

2018-07-31 16:08:33 UTC  

This is kinda why I don't take Anarcy seriously as a position. It's just authoritarianism except worse.

2018-07-31 16:08:37 UTC  

Anyone here an individualist besides me?

2018-07-31 16:08:41 UTC  

as long as they don't completely conflate the lattert

2018-07-31 16:08:44 UTC  

Me

2018-07-31 16:08:46 UTC  

Hearing a lot of collectivism

2018-07-31 16:08:49 UTC  

MOI

2018-07-31 16:08:51 UTC  

@Jaz (Raisu) ME DADDY