No you would choose which rights you want to be enforced and it would be mutiplied through out the country

Natural selection will push for more charitable ones over time if the people like them enough due to their own self interests influncing the choice and social darwisnism coming along

How would you do this?

it is possible

^

WHO chooses what rights?

The majority will choose

"We" is very... opaque.

With anarchy you cant enforce your sets of beliefs on others

The people with the money?

The majority?

in a state it happens all the time

Again, you'd do so by by votes, census, polls, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..

This is kinda why I don't take Anarcy seriously as a position. It's just authoritarianism except worse.

Anyone here an individualist besides me?

as long as they don't completely conflate the lattert

Me

Hearing a lot of collectivism

MOI

@Jaz (Raisu) ME DADDY

Most of us are individualists.

Really huh?

@LordCaledus CAN YOU PROVE THAT!?

We're just not extreme individualists.

then why do you want a state which is above the individual?

The only way it could become authoritarian is if democracies were to form

same with corporatocracy formation

So, as an individualist... if there is someone who disagrees with the laws of society that the majority want, what do you do?

@Maw?

"extreme"! you either value the individual or not

Petition for change, attempt to change the minds of other individuals.

a state violates that tennant

They can leave and find another place obviously...

@Maw iF YOU HAVE TO USE OTHERS ITS NOT INDIVISUALISTS

sorry for spag

It's not using other people.

yes it is you said change other peoples minds

and petition which requires others

Here are some facts for ya'll, I am a lazy pothead and now I'm mad because I smoked weed instead of voting, who puts me to rest

@Maw what would you do as part of the majority though?