yes

The only monoply it needs to have, is that of laws, and national defense

Ok, granted those for the moment

Would this state engage in other activities besides from these services?

That all depends on your constitution, and the limitations it has within

It shouldn't have to

would the governnment be crowding out any other company from the markets it enters

if its funded through taxation?

What market is it entering?

lets say schools for example

Why is it controlling the schools?

That's not its job

According to the nations constitution its allowed to operate publically funded schools

That's your own problem, bud. We're talking about the hypothetical here

No im posing the argument on why the government should not enter markets

at all

because it crowds out alternatives

Yeah, I agree

Common defense, and a lawbook should not be marketable though

So ur a minarchist with the exceptions of Laws and Borders?

That *is* a minarchist. The necessary minimum.

Laws and borders are the only legitimate domain of the state

Would your "laws" include an executie, legislativa and judiciary branch?

That's all unnecessary overhead. What's the point of it?

Just print a lawbook.

would they need enforcement though (Executive)

People use private arbitration all the time, and when are you ever dealing with a federal entity in law?

ICE? an example off the top of my head of america

IDRK im not american

Border patrol?

Yes i guess so

So would you agree with the Saga period icelandic model of libertarianism where laws were decided by the state but they would needed to be enforced privately?

idk what that is, but sure. Common law, and common defense.

so a legislative branch only and border patrol?

Why even have a branch? Seriously?

just a placeholder

Why would you want a state to have a monopoly over these services?

Because then someone else could arbitrarily institute strange laws where they see fit, or hold parties accountable more stringently than others.

It'd turn into a codified 'one law for you, one for me'

People would have to deal with multiple law codes for different circumstances

I can understand that, as well as border patrol

How would they be funded?

It's like asking "Why should a culture have a monopoly on language?"

What's to fund? It's a document. Who funds the constitution?