Give me a minute. I've an explanation on how we're supposed to act/believe.

"The Christian Ethic front

- You believe all living creatures are created by god, and that they look like/ are built as god wanted them to. God is allknowing and cant be wrong whilst the human often does wrong. Humanity should not "play god" and change other creatures heredity.

-You mean that because all humans are worth equal their differences and *uncompletenes* (I cant find a better word) dosent mean that some genes are unwanted. Not even genes that cause terrible disease. So you cant abort some embryos or fetuses because of their genes.

-You think that suffering has sometimes (but not always) a meaning. That meaning being a challange that god is putting you through. "

This is how we're supposed to act like in the RP thingy.

Pretty gay imo.

I'm gonna repost the question

"What would a radical christians view of genetic modification be? The modification being that the child will have a very easy time learning stuff and a hard time forgetting stuff."

I’d say they would be firmly against genetic modification. And IVF would probably be taboo.

Even babies with defects are “Gods will”.
And IFV would probably be looked down on to an extent. because infertility is part of God’s plan but making babies is super important.

Hmm yes. I understand.

But back to the point of the genetic modification. And the only thing I really need to care about is the memory thingy. What would the usual arguments be like? Is it even possible to make it remotally scientific?

I can’t think of a scientific argument from that perspective.

Mostly stonewalling with “The bible says”

Yeah. And that's not a working argument imo.

https://twitter.com/RTUKnews/status/1060580206338019328

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=2s&v=5UowNDaxRqU&feature=youtu.be

Reagan's humor was on point

lmaoo

Mind you this was after he was shot

TOP KEK

Fear The Reaper

https://twitter.com/sarahthustra1/status/1060597955110035456

LOSER

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

obviously the muslim

When comparing Feudalism and Communism, which of the two has more merit as a society?

Feud

Better dead than red

Fuedalism is at least sustainable

Better upward mobility

Depends on type of communism. Stalinist and maoist still had upward. But "theoretical" has none

https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/1060616847513579521

https://twitter.com/jihadwatchRS/status/1060589413586079745

fyi this is what he said

I'm too lazy to translate

I dont read sjw

ok he basically didnt deserve all the shit he's gotten