Message from @Angus
Discord ID: 510766817468481543
stole all our guns and burned down a couple houses to make it stick
"Unhinged monopoly" Monopolies are impossible in a free market as a competitor is always ready to jump into the market and offer a service better and cheaper, this happens all the time even now. "Slave labour" Slaves, even though cheap, are a remarkably unproductive and not a very viable business plan. Sure there may be some slaves hidden from view, but atm everyone is a slave to the state anyways. And I'm sure that the market would very quickly discard of companies who's practice they disagree with, like slave owners. Wdym by a "PMC"?
private military contractors
who's going to be the competitor when mcdonalds declares open warfare on all the other competitors and annihilates them since they can pay the most
Well then we'd go back to a state, and seeing that this new govt would learn from the mistakes of the old the likelihood is that it would be a better one. By playing the anarchist gambit you would get a state better or equal to the one now
then once everyone is gone they lower the wage
companies are not trustworthy
they will do whatever it takes to get more
and without literally anything holding them back
they will
do anything they want
to get more
Predatory pricing both in theory and practice is stupid for a company because when your losses become too deep you have to resell at a higher price which puts you into trouble from competitors
it's whiped out several companies!
once they're gone you don't have to give a shit about that!
you rule now
So the monolith is selling at a higher price then before at this point in time. As the law of supply and demand states a new competitor will rise up and sweep the market to return it to equilibrium
some local mom and pop isn't going to spring up and threaten your bottom line if you can just tell News INC to say they put cyanide in their coffee, and you've got enough money to get the script in front of them
And when the allegations go through court and comes back as false the alleger will be put into question, a reduce in sales for them is expected
here's an example of the soft drink industry getting pissed off at another company hurting them so they tell everyone that one of the harmless ingredients is also used in roach pesticide
what court
court incorporated?
mcbonnos owns them
The private arbitration service that keeps return custom for being seen to be impartial
>court company
>not corrupt
Obv both parties would have to agree on the court, if its corrupt then they wouldn't agree
I don't care what the actual happenings were, if they were lies or not, but the judge told him that he was rendering a verdict not because he believed it was the truth, but because he feared for his and his family's life
4 people testified against the man out of 90, 2 of them were dead within days, and the rest of them refused to testify for fear of death
but yeah courts would be impartial
"determined the abuse allegations were baseless, describing them as a "carefully crafted hoax" and indicting two of the original accusers on perjury charges" Right, so it looks like there is a high price to pay for hoaxed allegations as I said earlier
And it becomes a swift detterent
if nothing else, there's not much stopping them from just bombing their competitors and telling news inc to focus on the latest shooting instead of that
BRB, im gonna go play some chess
hev fun
Hey, so I found this on an Evening Standard article today. Is this factually accurate because I was under the assumption that the gender pay gap conflates between different occupations, but they say its for the same job?