Message from @seriade
Discord ID: 512996494731640842
True
The idea is the party puts out a manifesto and then everyone campaigns on that
It is supposed to put the focus on the issues
Australia has a similar system
I think most (informed) people realize that when they elect a president, they're electing an administration as well, with a 4 year plan
Then again we have had 7 prime ministers in as many years.... Soooooo
Doesn't always work
Parliamentary systems sounds like overly convulted mob rule
Nah. It's kind of like your electoral college except the members of the house represent the college votes
I just look at how this has all developed in Europe, and it blows my mind. It seems like the EU just sprang out of nowhere and, slowly became a regulatory body instead of a trade union WITHOUT the knowledge or approval of literally everyone but two countries, the UK finally realized that "Holy shit who gave these guys authority? They signed themselves into permanent office," tried to get out, and got betrayed by its leader.
Also we have preferential voting which makes things more interesting and stops mob rule
Yeah, convulted mod rule. Electors represent geographical areas, not demographic breakdowns by numbers
To be fair. Mob rule is more or less democracy anyway.
Just that mob is even bigger.
It blows my mind when people say "The X party is in charge, and THEY chose a leader to represent them"
I'm sorry, *the party chose a representative for me?*
You know who they are before they get voted in
In fact you know the entire cabinet
Do you get to vote on the candidate you prefer for them to pick from? We have elections for that. Well the Republican Party does. The Democrats pretend they do.
Not saying it's great
Or there's a coup within the party....
From the outside, it seems like your Parliament is run by parties, not people, and most of the reps could be swapped out for someone else and it would work just the same
I hate my country sometimes
most parlamentary democracies run this way
A lot of the time yes, but it means that we get a lot more independents having influence
At least that's here in Australia
I don't think Americans calling Reps and Dems 'parties' helps at all
We also have a lot more parties
thats why you need to do with what canada does and you have an official party status level
What should we call them then?
Big groups that run basically everything?
The Victorian state election is this month. The ballot is a metre long there are that many parties
In the US, someone could run as a 'democrat' because they like the color blue, and vote straight republican, while being honest about what he's doing.
And that's not a problem
They're glorified placeholders
Yeah and that voting record would draw all the wrong attention.
It means I can put the greens (my most hated party) at the bottom
@EnderOctanus I said honest for a reason.
the problem is that you have 20 parties that if you trace them back are broken up versions of other parties over some slight at some point
People in America don't care as much about honesty from politicians as the rest of the world seems to.