Message from @Segfault198
Discord ID: 540598283261837338
^
I do not care if some tyrant wants to pretend that the Constitution stopped meaning what it says.
It still says it.
Cool. Go on a 1 man rebellion when the atf comes for your illigal machine guns.
If they want to, they can ammend it. I can honor that.
Waco 2.0 incoming
I would not be wrong for doing so. It would be a political disagreement.
Part of that constitution is that scotus decides if a law is unconstitutional or not
BUT I can already get full auto guns
So you denying their rulings is against the constitution
It is just harder
And expensive
Not in some states
Yes. Fed overrides State
And any blemishes on you they can deny it
Tell that to the legal weed
They can yes. But again. I don't care at the end of the day. Choose your hill to die on, Floki. Something you believe in, or natural causes.
False dv allegations are used to remove gun rights all the time.
You can ridicule me but it does not make me wrong. I have my principles.
dv allegations?
Domestic violence
ah
Also felens cant
True
what part of the world are you in, floki?
US
But i have lived in a couple countries.
And all over the US
#armylife
Disarming people is pointless anyway. Given enough time and money anything can be acquired by anyone with enough determination. The interesting point here is conflicting law. In some cases laws designed to conflict for an end goal or political tactic. I think we see a lot of that in the US.
Well the black market will always exist true. Hence why total bans are retarded. The punishment is rather stiff for felons and dv offenders found with firearms. In states that have such rules for felons. Its more of a "make it more difficult" than anything.
I think it is alright to establish certain channels to obtain firearms. This does not, in principle, obstruct you from getting a firearm. A ban is what I have a problem with.
You just have to be able, in theory, to get the guns.
I have reservations about the felons thing but then it is very obvious why you should not let them have a gun.
Yeah I dont think anyone would argue that some sort of rules on the market are appropriate. I mean if you're going to buy a howitzer you should at least have to prove you're old enough.
Yes
Or at least not batshit insane.
If you are sane enough to sign a contract you are sane e ough to buy a gun. If you are not sane enough to buy a gun, you really cannot be considered to be in full working order.
So probably shouldn't vote either
That's a fair argument. Though mental illness isn't always permeant. That's going to make it difficult to deal with. Also what's the limits on a "contract"? Crazy people can sign up for an internet plan. This is usually a type of contract.