Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Discord ID: 548084503554424833
so put down your phone and read and play with your kids
you have to be strict AF as your kids grow up, but also make sure that you remind them how much you love them by taking them to fun places or doing fun stuff with them
then as they're older you should tell them the actual truth about things like sex and drugs instead of trying to scare them
strict as in not assholery, but as in, there are boundaries
and they won't be crossed
yea rules are important so you are not making an other spoiled brat. the world have far to many of them
Question, was it right for the UK government to strip the isis girl of her citizenship?
she did have dual citizenship so it was in there rights to remove the British one is the governments argument
@galesteppes you mean in a legal or moral way?
Both
moral yeah
@Nordhand the British government always had the ability to remove her citizenship, even if she wasn't a bangleshi citizen, she was entitled to claim it
Which still allowed the British to revoke her citizenship
legal, I don't know. How should a state treat an enemy combatant?
in interviews with her she said that she had no remorse of what she had done or been part of. I think that did make the choice easy as all she was looking for was a easy way out from the consequences of her actions
I personally would fly her ass back to Syria and have the locals do as they may, but this is a very arbitrary decision
she still is a supporter of ISIS and it evil dream, it just that now the dream is falling apart around her
She just wants that British welfare
yea and a good distance between her ass and the Kurds and other anti IS fighters as they do still believe in the eye for an eye part of the holy books
hot take, LOL...
https://twitter.com/BronxBloggerNYC/status/1098461749509046273
Well tbh international law doesnt allow any state to make a person stateless. If she is a dual citizen, and the fact the state she is living isnt trying to get rid of her, they have the right to revoke.
The law is to prevent a state from simply dumping unwanted people on another. But that isnt the case here.
Diane Abbott is the one claiming breach of human rights? imagine my shock
Asian meaning
I think there might be a slight difference between child sexual exploitation and joining isis
but I could be wrong
<:pepe_sad:378719408345841664> https://twitter.com/John_Kass/status/1098192209822863362
*Second, the association added, the justices should clarify that βa private property owner is not converted into a state actor merely because it operates a space where free expression is encouraged to occurβ*
This is wrong, the SCOTUS actually has ruled exactly that, in a case about someone streetcorner preaching in a private company town.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/02/argument-preview-justices-to-consider-whether-first-amendment-applies-to-public-access-channels/
Idk, as far as Iβm aware the arab countries wrre doing relatively well whilst venezuelans are starving to death atm
the arab countries that are doing well are the ones that trade oil in dollars <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
And the General population is still living in shit conditions, it's the kings that enjoy wealth
Isn't Erdoguan just fine now?
His Lira is shit but otherwise I think he is pretty solid, at least no military coup anytime soon
The situations are comparable, but from what I gather, Iraq and the other Arab countries had way better standards of living overall than Venezuela in the past few years
At least until the wars fucked shit up
Yeah
Bye enlightened islam