somethingsomething firebomb

it hard that you can convince a person in an argument but if one person in the argument behave like a monkey with explosive diarrhea you have a much easier time convincing the people on the side-lines

I mean, if you look at this pragmatically, the "Change my mind" show is essentially flawed, because no matter what you say, Crowder won't change his mind, since he comes with his preconceived and established arguments and points.

The show is more that of debating people, and getting his message out to a larger audience outside of his youtube channel

he do it for selfish reason that is clear.

He is arguing in bad faith, no? Claiming his mind can be changed, but with the actual goal of making his opponent look stupid?

I'm sure he would change his mind on an actually debatable topic with an intelligent person

Did he ever change his mind?

Has he ever spoken to someone who's not retarded? <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

did someone ever not reee?

The goal of the debate is like any debate. Both sides present arguements. Its really not about convincing the other side but the people on the sidelines. Few people who sit with him would be willing to change their own mind either.

yea he have not have had a peroson that ends being a turd flinging monkey in the end crying my feelings

Implying that the show isnt edited

@Deleted User he had one with that transe i think it was the only 2 genders

Implying that you aren't a gypsy

As long as you argue from first principles, it's easy to 'win' a debate

And the gun ones usually dont have ree either

The rape culture ones are full or ree tho

I like it how most times crowder has a lot more preparation anarguments prepared than most people in the street, but when someone makes an argument he has no answer for he retreats into what he criticizes other people for doing in debates

For example?

also he sits there all day and cuts it into a short video

Not really. There was once someone brought up stats and he was like, "im not sure of that. Lets look it up."

@Holy Intersectional Inquisition he cuts out the sitting but the actual times he is talking to someone its unedited, he has said that

Also, he usually has a binder of relevant evidence

Cant fault prep work.

well a live-stream would be interesting nonetheless

It would probably not be. It would be long periods of sitting and waiting, and random short bit convos not relevent.

you can make a live stream work but need a lot of prep to set up and still you have down time

hes a comedian, im sure he could fill 😄

@Fitzydog if the videos were unedited "God this is soo boring, when are they gonna debate"

Basically

You xan only fill so long in 4 to 6 hours.

doesn't he show the time lapsed footage anyways?

Some of it

Sometimes

is that a threat?
don't be surprised when Crowder shows up at your door with a camera crew dressed in leotards @Reaps

@Fitzydog When discussing abortion, he kept foccusing on semantics or the socialism is immoral he kept making fun of the dude who called something autistic

that was not a good environment for one of these though

He kept focusing on semantics because the other person couldn't keep their own terminology right, nor stay logically consistent with their own argument.

If you can't agree on definitions, then there's no point in having a discussion.

it's just like thinking that all migrants are refugees

I'll have to disagree with Steven Crowder. Rape culture is very alive in many cultures. Ever been in the middle east?