Rat vs Europe round 2

Fight!

Some black people unironically already believe that the US government is giving them AIDs on purpose.

@EnderOctanus yeeea

We arent that capable

Imma sneaky fox

Gave you AIDS

Omg why did he sit on my couch <:pepe_why:378719408367075333>

Treachery - This ties British Military to EU army even if we have a no-deal Brexit...
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-to-form-part-of-joint-eu-european-defense-force-pesco/

lol i thought with the phrase 'half'baked' thrown around so much it wouldn't go thru

> British following a Frenchman's lead

Now that's just sad

Oof

Is this the lead up to an EU army? Holy shit, things move fast when they're voting on shit they want

@Fitzydog the British military is technically loyal to the monarch only, so if Liz can grow a pair....

DISSOLVE PARLIAMENT AND REVIVE THE EMPIRE

For real though, that needs to happen

dissolve like acid

like acid attacks in london <:GWfroggyPepoSmug:398570232647647242>

@galesteppes she might retire soon. Question is will she pass it to her son, or her 1st born grandson. Her son will do more of the same.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46228454

Then no deal brexit.

No deal brexit > eus bitch brexit

The UN?

https://youtu.be/ndKwHSpZ5QQ

I would like someone to explain how fucked in the head this judge had to be to think there is anything regarding actual law even going on here.

Like, the White House Press Briefing is just a thing they do, it's not enshrined anywhere in law that it must be done

Or who must be allowed to attend.

I expect this to be fully overturned by a much more qualified judge.

Let them dig <:covfefe:440543908846632980> <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

what's happening with julian assange btw

and why hasn't trump pardoned him yet

@meratrix it was a temperary injuction based on quasi 5th admendment. Basically its the way the judge can recuse himself without actual recusal. As it stands for like 12 days until a higher judge rules

But he flat out said 1st amendment doesnt apply

So anyone reporting as if it's in favor of CNN is full of shit.

good to know

Tbh smartest thing the judge could do as he was appointed by trump. If he fully ruled for trump, media would have pushed the dems to get rid of him, and said trump is tyrannically owning the judiciary. If he rulled fully for the media then they would report that people are abandoning trump. This is middle ground ruling to allow a higher court to rule on the basis acosta wasnt warned his actions would have him ban. So trump is using it to make a tos

Ok, that's actually pretty good. Also, wasn't he warned multiple times about his behavior?

Basically codifying reagens rules that they have to sign to get a pass.

Not that im aware of before this event

Not officially. Beyond what any reporter tends to

http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181116000516