`

What is original in the President’s proposal is not good. What is good in the proposal is not original. Democrats will vote next week to add additional border security funding for ports of entry, advanced technology for scanning vehicles for drugs & immigration judges.

— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) January 19, 2019`

the single problem is that it trump that is proposing it, and that the southern border have been campaign promise now for over 30 years and they are not actually interested in fixing it as then who is going to be the servitude class of the rich that mow the lawns for a dime a day

He could really make himself look less cucked if he calls out that fact.

that will be a negative move in his case as the press will just spin it as Orange man bad attacks poor defenceless old woman

during this whole ordeal, his approval rating (on aggregate) has gone up. I think the public are really starting to see what a dumb (or evil) hag that Nancy is. He is setting it up so that the public will be extremely critical of Pelosi and what the house does.

yea but he do have time it right as if he plays it wrong it will turn back on him. it a PR game of chicken

@Nordhand I think it's more apt as a game of hot potato with a grenade

And now it looks like trump did win. As now it did turn out that she did turn down his last offer that had everything she wanted before he did announced it to anybody

<:trumped:440551399772913674>

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/radical-politics-extreme-left-right-wing-neuroscience-university-college-london-study-a8687186.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2QWELE579qx9DuNLkSkpOli05Xiy-nzWk0DTPLVtkOvWSZ9tWEOoHgXvw&utm_source=reddit.com#Echobox=1547744476]

Makes sense

The consequences of being wrong are too psychologically damaging so they refuse to acknowledge it as a defense mechanism.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-46926991/rise-in-nude-photos-sent-to-phones-on-public-transport

Yeah, people often think they've correctly used logic and objective reasoning to determine their own beliefs and actions... it's always someone else that's a useful idiot.

- A fine example of this is James O'Brien. He's intelligent, had the best of educations, and his latest book is called "How to be Right".

His arrogance knows no limits in his belief that anybody who doesn't agree with him is wrong - and yet he gets important topics wrong every single day, and no amount of evidence changes his mind.

how to be a belligerent douche bag that nobody likes

Has he washed his hair since Brexit?

You make videos @Fitzydog?

@Matt. No, I'm making *a* video.

Ahhh

Anyone else just get hit with about 2 feet of snow

I wish hahaha

Fitzy just wants a Purple name

Change My Mind

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

<:fake_news:430430057060630529>

We need a Change my mind emote

https://twitter.com/LauKaya/status/1086334889438384128 looks like it some good news out of EU as it looks like article 10 and 13 is failing as they cant agree on it anymore

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190118/11062441423/eu-cancels-final-negotiations-eu-copyright-directive-as-it-becomes-clear-there-isnt-enough-support.shtml

That author is absolutely atrocious at writing

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2019/01/19/equal-rights-amendment-why-arizona-could-state-put-over-top/2605903002/

They want to call a constitutional convention

oy vey

so what would this amendment actually look like in practice, i don't get it @Fitzydog

They list it right in the article. It's literally nothing.

"Equal rights for women and men."

Which the civil Rights act already does

that's why i'm confused

so i'm guessing it's gonna be used in some fucked up way

idk

@Fitzydog you should have been here last night

there was some faggot arguing that the constitution wasn't the law of the land