Message from @What Would Jack Conte Do?
Discord ID: 500146107511341056
doesn't often apply when it comes to hierarchy tho
So it would be more a principal than a pathos.
People understand it but dont follow it.
As not all cultures follow it.
a moral principle
i mean there's logical reasons to undermine the golden rule
depending on the objective
An *ethical principle* <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
sure
yeah, ethics morals and principles all blend together sometimes lol
or most times, i duno
Principles generally are derived from the other 2
An objective truth, that covers most people's subjective experiences
People generally build their principles from the logical extension of their own morals and ethics
yes, so even principles are subjective
then
thats why we can't agree on things
or other people can't
principles have an internal rationale
Everything based past natural instinct can technically be subjective
if you assume premises, then you reason into principles
or eg. ethnic identity is essential to human experience (ethno nationalist)
What is this new pink tag?
yeah, logic without objectives is just chaotic
@What Would Jack Conte Do? read the righteous mind.
Men's subjective experience with women in the Middle East is different than a Western man's, and their principles about it show that
like water contains hydrogen and oxygen - there's no why though, so you just randomly define everything for no reason whatsoever
i haven't read righteous mind 😛
probably get it on audiobook at some point
It's super good and it talks in depth about why you can't reason someone into a position when it comes to morality
I almost got bit by a rabid raccoon
I mean the raccoon furry here on the server lol
Oof
That's even worse
<:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>
But really what is this new pink tag?
weaver is a sadist
O.o
🤦🏻
<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>