Physics is the observation of how the universe operates, it is subjected to constant rigorous testing and updating of information to get as close to objectivity as we can. Morality isn't the measurement of physical properties it is about the beliefs of human beings. Comparing the two is laughable XP. And again, you can't explain how morality is objective. All you can do is throw out more and more nonsensical questions and demands for arguments from me. You can't supply your own. Weak.

@Roarey what did you expect from a zealot?

Can we exchange "objective morality" with "universal ethic"?

Nothing, I'm just enjoying myself

@Roarey -

Does reason exist?

Does math exist?

Does language exist?

Do words exist?

Do definitions of words exist?

If you claim i cannot derive morality from logic i assume that means i cannot determine morality from reason as well?

You have no positive argument to make

I think logic and reason are the same things.

Yeah not answering several questions mate. You supply an argument for how morality is objective. I've already done enough XP

@Roarey but that requires *e f f o r t*

logic - reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.
reason - a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.

@Roarey - They all have the same three letter answer of "yes".

I don't see the point of you even asking them.

My only point was if you believe morality is a personal preference i dont have to care about what you think about it

Still not argued for how morality is objective.

You still haven't supplied how morality is objective

Waiting.

afk - gotta piss

Go on.

lol

Go on bitch.

Tell me more about your non positive opinion

<:lobster:442083482211188738>

Why don't you actually back up a claim for once dan?

If it is only a preference why do you care?

I'll take it as a no then. Shame. Not even an attempt.

Ttfn.

You cannot even judge it in your world view

@Roarey He is best friends with commies who cannot argue so what did you expect?

Didn't miss much it looks like.

The old Hitchens 2 step

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xahmyVtzuNE

The things I listed were not things you observe in reality. They are reflections of reality. Much like how behavior is a reflection of concepts put into action that then create real effects.

I didn't miss much

Apparently

When people have an argument, both sides are supposed to make their case. I've made mine, you haven't made yours. And you won't because you know it is so laughably dumb I could tear it apart easier than I break wind.

You have made no case

you are just staking on a non positive claim

aka

The point of that is that just with the other things you can use concepts to construct what objective morality would be just based on the premises of the words themselves that are then acted out in the world that then can be measured for their effects with various metrics.

the Hitchens 2 step