good and bad are like a Ditto. They are what you want them to be.

Good things make my pp hard
bad things make my pp harder
this is my moral code

@HungBunny dan wants you to rape his wife and touch his children

I dunno who dan is but I'll pass because his wife is probably a gutter pig

Jk

jesus christ

After all, wHaT iS sUfFeRrInG

Now hold on i do not wish to be associated with such disrespect for this fine man

the point of it is that we're incapable of knowing what it is, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it's like saying the isn't an objectively best person in the world, who the fuck could that be, there's an objectively best asteroid in space, how the hell is that defined?

Suffering is the acceptance of knowing that you'll die, So get on with it and act accordingly

@Angus can't assert that something exists if you can't even define what it is. End of story.

Unless he were to consent to such disparriaging and make it subjectively permiscible

@Angus Yeah exactly, but we understand we all have potential to be the "best" and that's what we aim for. In general

Right and what the "best" of anything is depends on what you think the best is. It is a subjective thing.

Bullshit, we guess with senses where certain stars are. Very precise guesses with equipment but we aren't 100% certain

you can't just say that a concept can't exist because it's indefinable

that's the point of it

If you can't define it then you aren't talking about anything.

The sun at sunset is a projection. Is it still not the sun? It's not there but it is (btw I know this sounds retarded but you get it)

So it can't exist.

Can the question of something being best be right or wrong?

have you ever heard of abstraction or imagination?

Yes, and imagination and abstraction is conceptual not actual

not everything is logical or a literal mathematical formula

@Roarey What would you consider your fundamental ethics and morality

if i imagine a shoe. is the imagined shoe not a part of reality?

@HungBunny the removal of Australians

How about a fresh argument:
Which do you believe would be better for this world?
If everyone rigidly followed the objective moral code of christianity, down to every letter of the bible
Or judge each action or situation by the potential to prevent harm to others and make the least harmful decision themselves?

@Deleted User I identify as 99% european

He would want the world to suffer

if christianity is true, than its moral code would be objectively the best thing

"stone the gays"

@HungBunny 100% thot chaser

i came in a bit late so i don't know if Paul said christianity is the objective morality but that's not what i believe at all, we as humans wouldn't be able to define it with all the data in the world

> if christianity is true
Well i cant wait to hear your proof for that one

You posed the question

although weve already covered my favorite proofs for god which is an important part of the package

I base my moral values on human philosophy. At root I want to reduce harm and try my utmost to be honest. I believe that honesty and trying to get as close as one can to truth, through evidence and reason.

```How about a fresh argument:
Which do you believe would be better for this world?
If everyone rigidly followed the objective moral code of christianity, down to every letter of the bible
Or judge each action or situation by the potential to prevent harm to others and make the least harmful decision themselves?```

this is what i answered

I await your response