Message from @🌻 togepi 🌻
Discord ID: 507419147387535371
how dare you posit a theory that there's an objective morality without being ready to define the code of the universe
The fundamental Christian ethics
@DanConway I'm responding to the quote you deleted.
Kinda hard to give a full fledged response though since you deleted it.
@HungBunny don't make a claim if you can't back it up. He claims there's an objective morality, but won't say what it is or where it comes from or how he knows its there. It's nothing but an empty assertion and he's done nothing but dodge answering to any of it for over an hour. Bloody unbelievable.
the point of the quote was that arguing about which one is better implies there is a correct answer outside of personal preference in order for it to be a meaningful conversation
Being outside of personal preference does not make it objective. Hence the example I provided above.
Arguing which one is better means there's an argument. Which means there are people who believe in each side.
The sky is blue nigga
So there can't be a bloody objective true or false can they.
That's true no matter who says it
its something we can't know but must technically exist, like which kind of cheese is objectively the best in the universe
Because these moral religious battles are staying the same for hundreds of years and are never ever settled
So what makes christian morality the true objective morality as opposed to say...
satanic morality?
Paul pls respond u mustve missed this the first time
BTW, Natural Imperative was not arguing for objective imperative. Just to be clear on that.
God I hate dishonest actors. Makes me sick.
@Roarey that's why Catholics should be exterminated
Once he starts straight up ignoring our arguments its over
Im not even sure what satanic morality is
Oh its very nice dont worry
Secular Humanism you mean?
Wasting peoples time with bullshit, utter bullshit that they've no intention of ever backing up while maintaining the pretense of being respectable and having something to say. Playing a game with loaded dice, knowing they're going to put all the burden of explanation and demonstration on other people and never expecting to show the same courtesy and lay their own cards on the table. Like playing a game of poker, seeing your opponents hand and announcing your hand wins but never having to show it. Because it's actually a losing shitty hand.
everyone is their own person is the basic gyst of satanic morality
But what makes christian objective moral code the true objective moral code of the universe as opposed to any other religion's objective moral code?
Get thee tae fuck.
are you asking me to disprove every religion?
Yeah since youre claiming the existence of a supreme moral code youre claiming that no other moral code is true
@🌻 togepi 🌻 because he *feels* that it's real
That's all dan has
Feelings
What is good?
Lol there is a "supreme" moral code
You act it out retard
What is bad?
And yeah youre the one claiming there is an objective morality, so the burden is on you to prove it exists
I don't even care that the objective moral argument is based on feelings, what fucks me off to no end is the refusal to have the honesty, decency, dignity and courtesy to admit it.