Oh, well

@Angus Actually, they could have.

There were prototypes in the works.

Also, the Americans had superior firepower due to rifling on their guns vs the British muskets which did not

Then it doesn't need revision, no?

they meant they wanted all future types of personal weapon to be available to the people

if you just look at the spirit of the words

So really, the revolutionary war was won with BETTER than military grade weapons

what is one allowed to have if the gvovernment has super guns, mr. jeffersson???

So what's the problem then?

If all weapons are covered by the amendment

their argument is that they aren't

or shouldnt be

You mean

"is just for hunting"

There are some weapons that civilians should never be able to posses?

Well yeah obviously

nukes

Uhh

SHALL NOT

<:GWfroggyPepoThumb:400751103223922689>

i didnt know that was you fitzy, i kept thinking "who is this nigga?"

I mean it would be nice if we could give everyone a taser

To protect themselves

@Deleted User lmao

Instead of actual guns

Then no one would die

Unless they got gangtased

gtfo

<:GWfroggyMonkaMega:405753064100986880>

don't tase me bro

xD

a lot of peolpe die from getting tased.

Do they now

I doubt that

it a good way to find out if they have a bad heart

@Deleted User get your gay trap ass on vc

Nigga, how uninformed are you?

I'm on the bus <:GWqlabsKek:393085130219978752>

and?

even better

<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395> okay 1 sec

yeah you need to fix that turt