I forgot that my aunt got a boob job, it's ridiculous lol

kekekekekek

fast go full southern mode

I'm trying to find this one tweet from the head of an NZ ISP about the 4chan block

Theres a 4chan block?

In NZ at least

You can't get on 4chan, 8chan, or Liveleak

And probably a few others

I ain’t surprised to be honest. But I hope they change it back soon.

I'm sure that will fix some kind of problem

censorship fixes everything!

even imagined problems!

I remember seeing a tweet by a head of an ISP apologising for any inconvenience their customers may be experiencing in that regard, and that it was to stop the spread of the mosque shooting video, but I can't actually find the tweet

https://external-preview.redd.it/Jse2Dhl1WJa1GZ13wSIhEZyQHLA5ukgStFQx0lC6beQ.jpg?auto=webp&s=b38cb95d5748fdb40e0011956382c86569b4b121

In that case they’ll surelly fix it back soon?

By the way the tweet went, it does seem to be some sort of knee-jerk reaction, and it's unclear if there was government pressure, or if there was an agreement to block those websites for the time-being as a show of... something? by the ISPs

downloaded that image

@Mountain Man#6268

@MountainMan

Baba

The amount of people who are angry that some news sites prefer to report the story as a 'mass shooting' instead of a 'terrorist attack'
Both those titles are correct
It was a mass shooting with the intent to spread terror
People are claiming that the media is clearly saying 'mass shooting' cause they're white supremacist, otherwise they'd say 'terrorist'
A worrying amount of people seem to be completely oblivious to the amount of media sources that have roundly labelled the guy as a terrorist, and don't seem to grasp that if a media outlet really was white supremacist, they probably wouldn't be condemning the guy at all, not just not in the slant that some viewers want

Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri was a pretty good game.

https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1106907785722298373

Terrorist attack means there was a political motivation. One could argue this wasn't really done in the name of a particular ideology, but more to stir the pot... Imh it's still political

is it morally justifiable to force progress through violent mean ? yes or no

no

because people have to learn moral lessons on their own

if you force someone to act a certain way

that makes them neither moral nor immoral

because they are not making that choice by themselves

so its not OK that all other sperm cells die and only 1 becomes a baby?

wait what

that's just nature, nature is neither good nor evil

survival of the fittest is nature too

yeah

so whats the difference between taking land and killing ?

what does this have to do with survival of the fittest tho?

the most technology advanced culture will be the most fit for survival

so its just natural that native populations are killed

hmm

sounds wrong to me but i cant find fault in it