What is more, most fish that are particularly vulnerable to climate change are characterised by a low commercial and fishing significance. "The species most susceptible often have a smaller body size, they are rare species with a small distribution area, and are therefore not necessarily of direct economic relevance.

idk how it does

they just say it does

the point is that

deserts do get hotter because they are dry, that's because there is no cloud cover

even with their worst case scenario

if we do nothing

its really not that bad

I still dispute that human produced co2 has a statistically significant impact on Earth's climate

@oojimaflip let’s say you have a bucket with a hole in the bottom. You are putting water in and water comes out. The water goes up to almost the lid. This bucket is at an equilibrium same amount of water leaves as enters . Then you increase the water flow my 3% what happens

Earth's atmosphere is not equatable to a bucket with water in it. What lengths will you go to with these false analogies?

No

I’m saying

You're trying every tactic you can in desperation

You are saying what what ever percent of carbon dioxide

Humans create is small

Right?

Compared to the whole ecosystem

currently it is 3% of the annual flux

Sure

why doesn't the other 97% of that flux affect the climate?

You are saying humans create 3% this number is really small so how can it create an increase in co2

But I’m saying

In the bucket case

why does the natural co2 flux not have a greater effect than human produced co2?

If the system is at equilibrium and you increase the flow by just 3% water in the bucket will increase

stop with the analogies

you are bad at them

Why is it a bad analogy it shows such a small percentage of 3 can fuck over an equilibrium system. Systems in the environment remove co2 and add co2 then humans come along then add 3% more carbon dioxide. Well guess what your equilibrium system is fucked. The water is going to rise. Just like we see co2 concentrations rise in the environment

It’s actually a great analogy in my opinion

if you can't accept that a bucket filled with water is a bad analogy for the Earth's atmosphere then you are either willfully ignorant or intellectually dishonest. I have no time for either.

No

I am not saying it’s the same as the earth atmosphere I am disputing your claim that is basically humans create 3% this number is small why would it effect the system as a whole

It’s kind of a beautiful analogy

it's not my claim that human produced co2 is 3% of annual flux. it is fact.

Yes

But you are saying this number is insignificant right?

compared to the 97% of natural annual flux. yes.

how is this hard?

Okay just like the bucket

3% flow of water increase seems insignificant