buut they can build more desalination plants

this is from a left-wing source

(provided they can educate enough people to be able to run and maintain them)

oh... wait...

it represents the difference between doing nothing about climate change (current trajectory) at 2 degrees, and following the guidelines of the climate folks

which will surely reduce productivity greatly

at 1.5 degrees

it just doesn't look like a crisis to me

how does high temp lead to less water?

less freshwater

how?

higher temp means more salt water evap

greater circulation of water vapour

=more rain

deserts aren't dry because they are hot... it's because they are *inland* and away from sources of water vapour

it also depends on latitude, because of cold water sea currents

What is more, most fish that are particularly vulnerable to climate change are characterised by a low commercial and fishing significance. "The species most susceptible often have a smaller body size, they are rare species with a small distribution area, and are therefore not necessarily of direct economic relevance.

idk how it does

they just say it does

the point is that

deserts do get hotter because they are dry, that's because there is no cloud cover

even with their worst case scenario

if we do nothing

its really not that bad

I still dispute that human produced co2 has a statistically significant impact on Earth's climate

@oojimaflip let’s say you have a bucket with a hole in the bottom. You are putting water in and water comes out. The water goes up to almost the lid. This bucket is at an equilibrium same amount of water leaves as enters . Then you increase the water flow my 3% what happens

Earth's atmosphere is not equatable to a bucket with water in it. What lengths will you go to with these false analogies?

No

I’m saying

You're trying every tactic you can in desperation

You are saying what what ever percent of carbon dioxide

Humans create is small

Right?

Compared to the whole ecosystem

currently it is 3% of the annual flux

Sure

why doesn't the other 97% of that flux affect the climate?

You are saying humans create 3% this number is really small so how can it create an increase in co2

But I’m saying

In the bucket case

why does the natural co2 flux not have a greater effect than human produced co2?