now what?

the fact is that climate science is used by alarmists who exaggerate everything

His argument is centrally that the Earth has been much warmer in the past, before Humans existed in such numbers with their industry

@Weaboo Kempeitai imagine living in a society

There is change happening though
Environmental change in the Arctic and sub-arctic
Melting permafrost and glaciers fucking stuff up

Thus we can't attribute global warming necessarily to humans on the one hand, and on the other, we are in a much cooler period now than in that previous pre-mass-human-effect times

keep believing your propaganda if you want

even if they explicitly lie to you

That's the central argument dude

Do you deny those facts?

I dont think anyone disputes that the earth at one point in time was hotter than now

the argument is the hockey stick curve

meaning it has rapidly increased in a hundred years

And the correlation between Co2 and warming broken down in the late 90s, he claims

Again pointing to a flaw in the global warming thesis

Should have continued to raise if it was in some tight relationship

the correlation exists but doesnt mean anything, i thought

CO2 kept rising but temps didn't

Since the late 90s he said

whats your sources

At least for the most part

They aren't mine

His

refer them

You'll have to go through the episode

because I've seen him debunked

on this

Anytime you regress over such a large time period with so much exogeneity
Smoothing factors play such a huge role in making the graph you want and thus the conclusion

You are referring to authority again

debunked =/= authority

Did he also just win his lawsuit

Against one of his critics?

if he cites a paper wrong thats not an authoritarian argument

if he misunderstands it

"because I've seen him debunked"

Yes that's citing authority

You didn't say how or why

what xD

you have no idea

what I'm talking about

You said you've seen