Message from @Emperor of Atlantis
Discord ID: 636348575508463636
Luke in the old canon was the strongest
But unlike Anakin, he reached it
but other characters like Vitiate and Revan are hard to quantify
so I don't really know
I think Vitiate might have beaten Luke
The ancient sith were a whole different beast
RIP old cannon
Vitiate was probably the strongest of all time
He was a god after all
But Sidious was stronger if you ignore sorcery
@21ooAB Aren't they adding the Vong to the Disney canon?
I dunno
@Emperor of Atlantis Yeah but has a character, he evolved, after stewing for so long and focusing his rage. Plus, he had help from his brother, Savage.
Maul did a lot of feats in CW which he shouldn't have been able to
Thoughts?
also Dooku was underpowered
Correct
Dooku was a proper sith lord
Like? Beating Pre Vizla, a non-force sensitive Mandalorian? Or killing a Jedi? I mean, he killed Qui Gon, who was Jedi Council material.
and would have probably killed Anakin 1 vs 1
And he lost to Kenobi every time, lost to Sidious.
Be was by no means OP.
no on Mandalore, Maul was able to Force Choke Kenobi and throw him
Any good sith lord could have killed Qui Gon
this shouldn't have been possible
because Maul wasn't that strong
also Episode 3 Kenobi was way stronger
and Grievous is way too weak as well
Yes
as a comparison Grievous is meant to be really strong
Savage overpowering both Dooku and Ventress, now that's OP.
Kenobi basically defeated him effortlessly
yes Savage is way too op
@Emperor of Atlantis Dude, his strength was totally reasonable. And you're agreeing with me.
Clone Wars 2003 Grevious is way better
Tbh his new legs made him more powerful.
No