Message from @Weaboo Kempeitai
Discord ID: 636348946024759306
Maul did a lot of feats in CW which he shouldn't have been able to
Thoughts?
also Dooku was underpowered
Correct
Dooku was WAY stronger than Maul
Dooku was a proper sith lord
Like? Beating Pre Vizla, a non-force sensitive Mandalorian? Or killing a Jedi? I mean, he killed Qui Gon, who was Jedi Council material.
and would have probably killed Anakin 1 vs 1
And he lost to Kenobi every time, lost to Sidious.
Be was by no means OP.
no on Mandalore, Maul was able to Force Choke Kenobi and throw him
Any good sith lord could have killed Qui Gon
this shouldn't have been possible
because Maul wasn't that strong
also Episode 3 Kenobi was way stronger
and Grievous is way too weak as well
Yes
as a comparison Grievous is meant to be really strong
Kenobi basically defeated him effortlessly
yes Savage is way too op
@Emperor of Atlantis Dude, his strength was totally reasonable. And you're agreeing with me.
Clone Wars 2003 Grevious is way better
Tbh his new legs made him more powerful.
No
He lost force sensitivity
That was the OG gevious, I don't know why they cucked him tbh.
his claws made him more lethal
.
And? So did Vader.
but at the cost of balance and losing power
Maul was never that strong to begin with
they just needed the fanboys to love the new Maul though
Maul could jump higher, and use his legs to grip onto things like Gevious.
Gevious was extremely underused though.
At least the 2003 series explains his weakness away by having Mace crush his lungs, even if it was ham-fisted.
But CW turns him into a laughing stock.
I suppose an exception was when he attacked the Mother Talzan