and would have probably killed Anakin 1 vs 1

And he lost to Kenobi every time, lost to Sidious.

Be was by no means OP.

no on Mandalore, Maul was able to Force Choke Kenobi and throw him

Any good sith lord could have killed Qui Gon

this shouldn't have been possible

because Maul wasn't that strong

also Episode 3 Kenobi was way stronger

and Grievous is way too weak as well

Yes

as a comparison Grievous is meant to be really strong

Savage overpowering both Dooku and Ventress, now that's OP.

Kenobi basically defeated him effortlessly

yes Savage is way too op

@Emperor of Atlantis Dude, his strength was totally reasonable. And you're agreeing with me.

Clone Wars 2003 Grevious is way better

Tbh his new legs made him more powerful.

No

He lost force sensitivity

That was the OG gevious, I don't know why they cucked him tbh.

his claws made him more lethal

.

And? So did Vader.

but at the cost of balance and losing power

Maul was never that strong to begin with

they just needed the fanboys to love the new Maul though

Maul could jump higher, and use his legs to grip onto things like Gevious.

Gevious was extremely underused though.

At least the 2003 series explains his weakness away by having Mace crush his lungs, even if it was ham-fisted.

But CW turns him into a laughing stock.

https://youtu.be/X5t8A0NUCrI?t=219

I suppose an exception was when he attacked the Mother Talzan

This grevious was OP as hell

Delivering dozens of strikes in seconds

yeah

everyone was OP in the 2003 CW

Tbh, Grevious in theory should have been able to kill any Jedi Master

As delivering 1000s of strikes a second cannot be blocked

even with max force sensitivty

Literally the only time Gevious was a badass outside the 2003 series. https://youtu.be/wIoIpJ5eou8

at least up close