Message from @nr

Discord ID: 636727777311064065


2019-10-24 00:46:14 UTC  

and its become this extreme thing

2019-10-24 00:46:20 UTC  

Jews destroy everything

2019-10-24 00:46:28 UTC  

They are the manifestation of evil and sickness

2019-10-24 00:46:29 UTC  

The main reason for keeping boys in dresses was toilet training, or the lack thereof.[4] The change was probably made once boys had reached the age when they could easily undo the rather complicated fastenings of many early modern breeches and trousers. Before roughly 1550 various styles of long robes were in any case commonly worn by adult males of various sorts, so boys wearing them could probably not be said to form a distinct phenomenon. Dresses were also easier to make with room for future growth, in an age when clothes were much more expensive than now for all classes. The "age of reason" was generally considered to be about seven, and breeching corresponded roughly with that age for much of the period. The many portraits of Balthasar Charles, Prince of Asturias (1629–1646), son of Philip IV of Spain, show him wearing breeches from about the age of six.

For working-class children, about whom even less is known than their better-off contemporaries, it may well have marked the start of a working life.

2019-10-24 00:46:31 UTC  

slaving for mr rothberg = being fullfilled

2019-10-24 00:46:45 UTC  

it was mainly practical and for the masses little is known

2019-10-24 00:46:49 UTC  

Makes sense

2019-10-24 00:47:08 UTC  

but the idea of gender neutral children is common even in asia

2019-10-24 00:47:10 UTC  

Reads as though it was common among the common too

2019-10-24 00:47:14 UTC  

getting your name was a ritual in itself

2019-10-24 00:47:24 UTC  

you werent a full human yet until you could survive to a certain age

2019-10-24 00:47:28 UTC  

so yea I still call bullshit and for those that practiced it, well europe at certain times among the elite is the epitome of degeneracy

2019-10-24 00:47:37 UTC  

and this is just another proof of that

2019-10-24 00:48:00 UTC  

Yeah Europeans do sort of consider children 'gender neutral' of course they have primary sexual characteristics which are acknowledge but it's for the same reason that sexualising them is seen as wrong

2019-10-24 00:48:24 UTC  

we still do it today lol

2019-10-24 00:48:24 UTC  

And again, by the 19th and 20th centuries it was common among all classes

2019-10-24 00:48:35 UTC  

yet I never see that

2019-10-24 00:48:41 UTC  

you go hey lookout for the kid down the street they ride their bike

2019-10-24 00:48:47 UTC  

not the boy/ girl

2019-10-24 00:48:49 UTC  

maybe because it didn't happen in the US

2019-10-24 00:48:51 UTC  

study your history better?

2019-10-24 00:48:53 UTC  

its normal

2019-10-24 00:48:53 UTC  

Borden for example, wasn't any elite, my dude literally grew up on a farm

2019-10-24 00:48:58 UTC  

Was poor

2019-10-24 00:48:59 UTC  

america is a strange place to begin with

2019-10-24 00:49:11 UTC  

all your cities are masonic/kabbalistic symbols

2019-10-24 00:49:20 UTC  

the founders were sketchy

2019-10-24 00:49:31 UTC  

magic cities

2019-10-24 00:49:36 UTC  

<:JFGOD:439598359628611604>

2019-10-24 00:49:44 UTC  

WTF am I bronwed?

2019-10-24 00:50:01 UTC  

for your haggetry

2019-10-24 00:50:10 UTC  

what?

2019-10-24 00:50:15 UTC  

idk maybe you said a naughty word

2019-10-24 00:50:21 UTC  

🤔

2019-10-24 00:50:24 UTC  

he said it 3x

2019-10-24 00:50:28 UTC  

N

2019-10-24 00:50:45 UTC  

🇫

2019-10-24 00:50:56 UTC  

@Str3tch = knows a word that starts with N

2019-10-24 00:51:02 UTC  

<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

2019-10-24 00:51:05 UTC  

i guess technically a lot of women today are transvestites

2019-10-24 00:51:11 UTC  

but nobody thinks about it anymore