Not fair to equate it to what is happening now though

coming of age rituals were so important to identity

keeping family together

etc

Cumming

now most people identify as gamers or their mindless job

im a student! yikes

People have always identified as thier job though

it took a long time but people got deracinated and denationalized

job used to be a skill based activity

Though thier jobs were thier lifestyle back then

the last normal people are tradesmen

yes women are trying to get fulfillment from work, not families

So yeahz it was a real thing but, to reiterate, totally distinct from chemically castrating your child and trying to convince little boys that they're little girls. This was mostly wholesome and just meant to signify a child's sexual purity and serve as a coming of age ritual, what is happening now is just Judaic degeneracy and evil

fullfill > work

lol

yeah my point beady was that is funny how an age old tradition has been perverted yet again

society for wagies

and its become this extreme thing

Jews destroy everything

They are the manifestation of evil and sickness

The main reason for keeping boys in dresses was toilet training, or the lack thereof.[4] The change was probably made once boys had reached the age when they could easily undo the rather complicated fastenings of many early modern breeches and trousers. Before roughly 1550 various styles of long robes were in any case commonly worn by adult males of various sorts, so boys wearing them could probably not be said to form a distinct phenomenon. Dresses were also easier to make with room for future growth, in an age when clothes were much more expensive than now for all classes. The "age of reason" was generally considered to be about seven, and breeching corresponded roughly with that age for much of the period. The many portraits of Balthasar Charles, Prince of Asturias (1629–1646), son of Philip IV of Spain, show him wearing breeches from about the age of six.

For working-class children, about whom even less is known than their better-off contemporaries, it may well have marked the start of a working life.

slaving for mr rothberg = being fullfilled

it was mainly practical and for the masses little is known

Makes sense

but the idea of gender neutral children is common even in asia

Reads as though it was common among the common too

getting your name was a ritual in itself

you werent a full human yet until you could survive to a certain age

so yea I still call bullshit and for those that practiced it, well europe at certain times among the elite is the epitome of degeneracy

and this is just another proof of that

Yeah Europeans do sort of consider children 'gender neutral' of course they have primary sexual characteristics which are acknowledge but it's for the same reason that sexualising them is seen as wrong

we still do it today lol

And again, by the 19th and 20th centuries it was common among all classes

yet I never see that

you go hey lookout for the kid down the street they ride their bike

not the boy/ girl

maybe because it didn't happen in the US

study your history better?

its normal