Message from @nr
Discord ID: 636727342177320960
im a student! yikes
People have always identified as thier job though
it took a long time but people got deracinated and denationalized
job used to be a skill based activity
Though thier jobs were thier lifestyle back then
the last normal people are tradesmen
yes women are trying to get fulfillment from work, not families
So yeahz it was a real thing but, to reiterate, totally distinct from chemically castrating your child and trying to convince little boys that they're little girls. This was mostly wholesome and just meant to signify a child's sexual purity and serve as a coming of age ritual, what is happening now is just Judaic degeneracy and evil
fullfill > work
lol
yeah my point beady was that is funny how an age old tradition has been perverted yet again
society for wagies
and its become this extreme thing
Jews destroy everything
They are the manifestation of evil and sickness
The main reason for keeping boys in dresses was toilet training, or the lack thereof.[4] The change was probably made once boys had reached the age when they could easily undo the rather complicated fastenings of many early modern breeches and trousers. Before roughly 1550 various styles of long robes were in any case commonly worn by adult males of various sorts, so boys wearing them could probably not be said to form a distinct phenomenon. Dresses were also easier to make with room for future growth, in an age when clothes were much more expensive than now for all classes. The "age of reason" was generally considered to be about seven, and breeching corresponded roughly with that age for much of the period. The many portraits of Balthasar Charles, Prince of Asturias (1629–1646), son of Philip IV of Spain, show him wearing breeches from about the age of six.
For working-class children, about whom even less is known than their better-off contemporaries, it may well have marked the start of a working life.
slaving for mr rothberg = being fullfilled
it was mainly practical and for the masses little is known
Makes sense
Reads as though it was common among the common too
getting your name was a ritual in itself
you werent a full human yet until you could survive to a certain age
so yea I still call bullshit and for those that practiced it, well europe at certain times among the elite is the epitome of degeneracy
and this is just another proof of that
Yeah Europeans do sort of consider children 'gender neutral' of course they have primary sexual characteristics which are acknowledge but it's for the same reason that sexualising them is seen as wrong
we still do it today lol
And again, by the 19th and 20th centuries it was common among all classes
yet I never see that
you go hey lookout for the kid down the street they ride their bike
not the boy/ girl
maybe because it didn't happen in the US
study your history better?
its normal
Borden for example, wasn't any elite, my dude literally grew up on a farm
Was poor
america is a strange place to begin with
all your cities are masonic/kabbalistic symbols
the founders were sketchy
magic cities