cliamte change alarmists worry about a .2 degree change

the most powerful and best nations were created by north westerners, there is no need to take others history

@Banjod there are frequencies of blonde in Greece. But the records I have read do not claim he had naturally blonde hair. They more seems they indicated his hair bleached since he was in the sun so long. He grew up in a lower class family. But there are frequencies of blonde in Med populations. Catalonia and Italians have it. They get it especially in areas near the mountains where it gets cold and little sun sunshine.

that part supposedly caused by humans

they are nuts

it's a power grab racket

the frequency of blond hair in these areas is like 1 in 30

if that

Do you know what the no. 1 contributor to the greenhouse effect is?

Permafrost is melting up north
Cities starting to sink
Who cares if it's "normal" or not

negroes

there have been finds of blondes in these areas

Correct

but those are the minorities

the north used to be frozen all the way to the netherlands

under ice

<@305516252904816640> dude, we KNOW they weren't nordic

big deal

it doesn't even make sense

hyperboria is russia btw

@Banjod I am not arguing with you on that. This is just what I have read some about. I am not a Christian identity guy. He had brown hair. They knew he was Galilean because he was so worked and bleached. He wasn't Nordic either. I never intended this to get out of hand.

ok, what were you saying then

lol

there almost no evidence of 1 jesus existing and even if he had all the anecdotes are bunk

Wut

wow

uneducated

if you're christian, you already know you're not being unbiased

just saying

I can post videos of atheist scholars claiming he existed

I don't care if he existed, and I prefer if he did

but..

I'm not christian

tall tales

Even atheists claim he existed. They just say he wasn't divine, which is fair.

I'm yes christian

compield by jews in greece 500 ad

I know they are mixing data because.... and it’s bad because..... we mix data all the time. Definitely historical data. Else we couldn’t never compare modern data to old information. Back in the day they used this method to measure data now we use this different method oh I guess we can never compare this information ever. This doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t matter if you got information different methods as long as you know it’s accurate. This is why you can compare ice core to modern day data. It’s okay to mix data if it’s the only way. But you haven’t even proven they are mixing data anyways.@troglodytes

But if I'm too assume countless historical figures with less evidence existed than by default I must by the same standards accept christ existed

^

it's utter non-sense to assume otherwise