Message from @Banjod
Discord ID: 637220364069371924
negroes
there have been finds of blondes in these areas
Correct
but those are the minorities
the north used to be frozen all the way to the netherlands
under ice
<@305516252904816640> dude, we KNOW they weren't nordic
big deal
it doesn't even make sense
hyperboria is russia btw
@Banjod I am not arguing with you on that. This is just what I have read some about. I am not a Christian identity guy. He had brown hair. They knew he was Galilean because he was so worked and bleached. He wasn't Nordic either. I never intended this to get out of hand.
ok, what were you saying then
lol
there almost no evidence of 1 jesus existing and even if he had all the anecdotes are bunk
Wut
wow
uneducated
if you're christian, you already know you're not being unbiased
just saying
I can post videos of atheist scholars claiming he existed
but..
I'm not christian
tall tales
Even atheists claim he existed. They just say he wasn't divine, which is fair.
I'm yes christian
compield by jews in greece 500 ad
I know they are mixing data because.... and it’s bad because..... we mix data all the time. Definitely historical data. Else we couldn’t never compare modern data to old information. Back in the day they used this method to measure data now we use this different method oh I guess we can never compare this information ever. This doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t matter if you got information different methods as long as you know it’s accurate. This is why you can compare ice core to modern day data. It’s okay to mix data if it’s the only way. But you haven’t even proven they are mixing data anyways.@troglodytes
But if I'm too assume countless historical figures with less evidence existed than by default I must by the same standards accept christ existed
^
it's utter non-sense to assume otherwise
the bible is pure
you dont
it says so in their own website
you really don
@troglodytes where
I'm convinced
the difference is the want of the person existing
why are they saying it
nope
not at all