Message from @Blake4014
Discord ID: 638184974264172545
devolve isnt even a thing
<:oof:399031884312739841>
it just sounds sort of nice
you adapt to environment
nothing more
theres no moral/value/progress judgement
climate change , saving black ppl and vaping
<:oof:399031884312739841>
@Nerthulas Whatever system of logic you deploy, it must reign supreme in order to achieve coherence
The body has so many obvious 'design' flaws, that no engineer would make us this way.
science
what's really going on is that we have no access to the world except through the lens and matrix by which we interpret and organize phenomena, the brain
@fuguer he uses the term to describe the breaking of existing functionality for short-term adaptation. Rather than creating new functionality all together. Like stunting beak length, for example
nice beauty mask
so it appears concrete to us
yes, of course most mutations are harmful
but not all
yes
I like evolution, if gives us a strong ideological basis for race and differences.
and you have no concept of the time scales involved, the # of organiisms, generations, cellular reproduction
the dyer/darth position doesn't rely on positive evidence
well, even the "harmful" mutation can be beneficial. For example, the adaptation to malaria. It's actually just broken functionality
Ahhhhhhh
The best counter evolution I've heard of is what if a bunch of organisms were created at the same time by aliens and then evolved as normal AFTER that?
Cambrian explosion maybe.
thats not a counter thats a "wouldnt it be cool if"
but we dont need aliens to explain cambrian explusion
mutations is how we get X-men..
so, necessary for the next step in human evolution
the problem with that is that it just pushes it back one step
Tfw you'll never smell her gooch
show bob
you then have to ask: what causes the aliens to be alive?
god
so it doesn't solve the problem at all
apply occam's razor
and get rid of the aliens