Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 638936201553772568


2019-10-30 03:02:32 UTC  

Ultimately, environment produced genes.

2019-10-30 03:02:38 UTC  

nurture IS nature

2019-10-30 03:02:38 UTC  

you can find simple protein anywhere in space

2019-10-30 03:02:39 UTC  

@BabygottBach RNA came from doing your mom doing your mom

2019-10-30 03:02:39 UTC  

yes...

2019-10-30 03:02:42 UTC  

The environment was here long before genes were.

2019-10-30 03:02:43 UTC  

<:dab:395562678153904128>

2019-10-30 03:02:45 UTC  

nature is nurture, yes

2019-10-30 03:03:02 UTC  

isn't nurture product or nature?

2019-10-30 03:03:08 UTC  

yes

2019-10-30 03:03:11 UTC  

ofc

2019-10-30 03:03:17 UTC  

chicken or egg

2019-10-30 03:03:19 UTC  

we're not talking about air temperature

2019-10-30 03:03:29 UTC  

So whoever was attributing primacy to genes in the gene environment relation has it completely backwards.

2019-10-30 03:03:30 UTC  

@BabygottBach it's entirely related, the relation is the display of the fact that genetic variations can exist within species that significantly and observable create vast disparities in their abilities and behaviours based on genetic predispositions

2019-10-30 03:03:56 UTC  

@that explains the massive and rapid shifts in history? absolutely not.

2019-10-30 03:03:57 UTC  

the man made environment, not the CO2 in the air from a belching volcano

2019-10-30 03:04:03 UTC  

Yes it does

2019-10-30 03:04:08 UTC  

It does exactly that

2019-10-30 03:04:12 UTC  

@BabygottBach genetic biochemistry is basically the same as machine learning you have experiment that works and some that fails

2019-10-30 03:04:21 UTC  

it doesn't change anything to understand environment came first, the point of the gene-environemnt relation model is to show enviroment changes genes changes environment

2019-10-30 03:04:32 UTC  

but genes can lead you to living next to an active volcano

2019-10-30 03:04:35 UTC  

No, it quite literally does not, unless you are proposing that genes of a population somehow shifts at breakneck pae.

2019-10-30 03:04:37 UTC  

ban volcanoes

2019-10-30 03:04:47 UTC  

or a place not suitable for agriculture

2019-10-30 03:04:53 UTC  

genes can lead u there too

2019-10-30 03:05:00 UTC  

How does it presume that? @BabygottBach

2019-10-30 03:05:24 UTC  

If you are a student of history, you would know of the rapid rises and falls of different cultures and civilizations.

2019-10-30 03:05:31 UTC  

Yes

2019-10-30 03:05:34 UTC  

And?

2019-10-30 03:05:39 UTC  

I'm really butthurt that we can't get catgirls without a revolutionary phenotype

2019-10-30 03:05:43 UTC  

it's not fair bros

2019-10-30 03:05:55 UTC  

@BabygottBach When did African civilization rise?

2019-10-30 03:05:56 UTC  

If genes account for these rapid changes, theen they would also need to change just as rapidly

2019-10-30 03:06:10 UTC  

@canadagamer9, multiple civilizations existed in Africa

2019-10-30 03:06:22 UTC  

@BabygottBach we are aware of it, and your ideology is contributing to the fall of ours

2019-10-30 03:06:39 UTC  

catgirls?

2019-10-30 03:06:40 UTC  

Well genes can shift an breakneck pace. Imagine killing off everyone above 6 foot each generation for 400 years. Now think what would happen if we did the same to criminals. Culture accelerates evolution.

2019-10-30 03:06:45 UTC  

@BabygottBach no they wouldn't need to change just as rapidly lmfao

2019-10-30 03:06:48 UTC  

@BabygottBach When did Bantu civilization rise?

2019-10-30 03:06:53 UTC  

that's a cat women