Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 639666039269097482
I understand that, and yet
shouldn't clustering occur when looking at many loci
you can still find a black guy that is a lot like yourself, and an indian dude that has the same face as your neighbour
doesn't it occur all over the place?
movie is working, watching Cube
isn't looking just at one gene dishonest
join chat to watch stream
dishonest as to what?
it's dishonest to want to "disprove" race
but when you look at a certain gene, you do that
I'm watching, and listening in VC, I just don't have a mic setup..
@You feel safe with an account I've come across a spaniard population genomics student
who says he's debunked race
because
@Leaf too badly we can't watch together. I will have it figured out for next time.
populations should cluster on this specific gene
and they dont
in his pca
lol
i guess there are no races when it comes to that one gene then
we should make an organism that consists only of the very common genes
and see what happens
lmao
my question was, rather
in pogenomics/ archaeogenetics, do they use only specific genes?
or the loci are chosen at random
you can totally deny race, but why would you want to throw away that data?
it's like blinding yourself voluntarily in a way
if the racial clusters weren't obvious as in they correlate with a lot of worldly events, it wouldn't be a whole thing
saying all racial discrimination is superficial is just dumb
bruh
my last question
My fault for being a phonef*g <:imfine:397531800022286336>
how would you "prove" race, as a hypothetical
you'd have to define it even to disprove it
i'd love to see that not strawmanned definition