Message from @You feel safe with an account
Discord ID: 639665654303031306
Am I correct in identifying this as fallacious?
"see? No clustering on this very specific gene region!"
"races are false, if they existed, they should cluster as following:"
why should they?
is there a recipe for racial trait clustering now?
we should follow it
I know
personally i also think there could be more racial separation, it would be even more interesting
but i never needed any additional evidence after seeing my first couple of other races
it's weird to me how people want to pretend they don't notice
and very scary to imagine they actually can't
I understand that, and yet
shouldn't clustering occur when looking at many loci
you can still find a black guy that is a lot like yourself, and an indian dude that has the same face as your neighbour
doesn't it occur all over the place?
movie is working, watching Cube
isn't looking just at one gene dishonest
join chat to watch stream
it's dishonest to want to "disprove" race
but when you look at a certain gene, you do that
I'm watching, and listening in VC, I just don't have a mic setup..
@You feel safe with an account I've come across a spaniard population genomics student
who says he's debunked race
because
@Leaf too badly we can't watch together. I will have it figured out for next time.
populations should cluster on this specific gene
and they dont
in his pca
lol
i guess there are no races when it comes to that one gene then
timestamp 2:04
we should make an organism that consists only of the very common genes
and see what happens
lmao
my question was, rather
in pogenomics/ archaeogenetics, do they use only specific genes?