Message from @Marcellinus
Discord ID: 639666318991425537
but when you look at a certain gene, you do that
I'm watching, and listening in VC, I just don't have a mic setup..
@You feel safe with an account I've come across a spaniard population genomics student
who says he's debunked race
because
@Leaf too badly we can't watch together. I will have it figured out for next time.
populations should cluster on this specific gene
and they dont
in his pca
lol
i guess there are no races when it comes to that one gene then
timestamp 2:04
we should make an organism that consists only of the very common genes
and see what happens
lmao
my question was, rather
in pogenomics/ archaeogenetics, do they use only specific genes?
or the loci are chosen at random
you can totally deny race, but why would you want to throw away that data?
it's like blinding yourself voluntarily in a way
if the racial clusters weren't obvious as in they correlate with a lot of worldly events, it wouldn't be a whole thing
saying all racial discrimination is superficial is just dumb
bruh
my last question
My fault for being a phonef*g <:imfine:397531800022286336>
how would you "prove" race, as a hypothetical
you'd have to define it even to disprove it
i'd love to see that not strawmanned definition
how is a race of dogs different from a people with clearly identifiable traits?
as long as neither of them can turn into zebras
it's probably god's will
that some people want to rather ignore their inherent differences
like some "modern" females
and certain migrant populations
it's too sexy to identify with the accomplishments of white males
they will never want to give that up
