Message from @stem
Discord ID: 640206291092111362
Ok “It’s **OK** to be white” says that’s fine being white, there isn’t any baggage being a white person.
But there is a shit ton of baggage with moon man and mainstream society has deemed it **not ok**. So putting the two together will make it seem like people who say “it’s ok to be white” are just racist and in turn that it really isn’t ok to be white because just saying the phrase “gets those whites acting up again” @The-Free-Monk
That latter part is implied but it’s *still there*
they turned the okay sign into a racist symbol
a white supremacist symbol
could they do the same with "it's okay to be white"?
i still can't believe they did that with the hand sign
it feels unreal
A lot of normies don’t think about it, so they just assume what the media tells them.
i mean
i know it was halloween, but anyone trying to spread the message of "it's okay to be white" should do so without trying to obscure their identity, because there is absolutely nothing wrong with the message.
how can it be
it's crazy
it's not fucking siegeposting
the hand sign thing
how can anyone say it with a straight face?
Baste
Kiss
Siegeposting?
Baste jew band
<:Yes:639977935209627658>
do they benefit from saying the okay hand sign is actually white supremacist?
hmmmm
by "they," i mean adl, media, etc
Thankfully there are all-white communities in SA. White South Africans should stand their ground until the state have no choice but to use force against them. Literally provoke a race war by not relinquishing the land they rightfully own.
<:zoomer:639984566752509954>
need a cost/benefit analysis 😄
<:zoomer:639984566752509954> <:Gun:639978512207314973> <:boomer:639983474236850176>
Like graffiti during a siege?
What peterson or sargon promote, "radical individualism" is essentially trying to persuade ppl that, because they are individual organisms that they should not care about the things they share with other individuals. It is absolutely retarded and has no bases of persuasion, so they rely on muh nazism, or as peterson puts it that white identity manifests In genocidal fashion. Which is an absolutely untrue statement which willingly ignores genocide across all human history and ignores the dynamics leading to such events or ignores that socially conservative white nations ended slavery or didn't engage in it or genocide for moral rsns whilst maintaining conservative immigration policy and views of their own grp.
The idea that "grp politics bad" is inherently wrong.
At least go full "leftist" and admit you don't care about inheritance or think its bad or you don't care about survival/existence of these shared things (genes/society/civilisation), off course I put leftist in brackets because not even they are consistent on this point they don't ever dispute non white grps on their Ethno-centric ideals especially with native Americans.
where did u copy-paste that from?
just random stuff i wrote in debates
Not even Libertarians beleive that, though, and that's where Sargonism fails. Individuals, when left to their own devices, form collectives; collectivism is human nature. People who don't work cohesively with others are rightfully shunned, and humans naturally identify and exclude outgroups.
and centrism wins again
unless anyone wants to claim the group is the only thing that matters
Sargon wouldn't even counter signal you