It’s alright

Shit is so tiresome

they will NEVER reply when I make a straight forward argument

They use the same arguments from over 20 years ago

@Yek , you're about to get banned

I thought that was the reason that the color brown was invented?

@Banjod why would i get banned

because you're a dishonest scum @Yek

Peer review can literally be as simple and procedural as a single reviewer checking whether it is a valid paper. It's literally 100% dependent on the journal published.

you're not reasonable at all

@Banjod What did I say that was dishonest?

it's how you act

But even then, it's bullshit because journals don't have universal peer review rules in all cases.

don't need to ban,
but browning isn't out of the question

banning is bad optics banjod <:monkaS:299267496668692493>

either you stop coming here and just ignoring every argument you don't like

and bother everyone

or you don't come at all...

this is literally what JF does

@Banjod which arguement did I ignore?

look at this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subspecies#Doubtful_cases

and tell me how it does not apply for humans

@Roko what argument?

@Banjod ban him

I gave you an example of what they're saying in the text, and you ignored it

because you know

is he chinese?

yes or no

⏲️

Subspecies is a valid replacement word for "race"

It sounds mean tho

"When geographically separate populations of a species exhibit recognizable phenotypic differences, biologists may identify these as separate subspecies; a subspecies is a recognized local variant of a species."

yek, see, you have to write 5 mintues to write something to explain away, instead of just answering

this is what I mean

are different types of dogs considered subspecies?

ok, boring conversation anyway..
Anyone have a good recommendation for a good movie?
maybe sci-fi?

Or, more simply said: geographic separation causing noticeable variation means a valid subspeciation

Breeds

like a chuahua and a great dane

yes, that's why we call some mutts..