Message from @Banjod
Discord ID: 645462201234096129
“67” said that
I wish these guys would come here with something better
I was being sarcastic.
There was an Indian guy here who made some good arguments
It’s alright
Shit is so tiresome
they will NEVER reply when I make a straight forward argument
They use the same arguments from over 20 years ago
I thought that was the reason that the color brown was invented?
Peer review can literally be as simple and procedural as a single reviewer checking whether it is a valid paper. It's literally 100% dependent on the journal published.
you're not reasonable at all
it's how you act
But even then, it's bullshit because journals don't have universal peer review rules in all cases.
don't need to ban,
but browning isn't out of the question
banning is bad optics banjod <:monkaS:299267496668692493>
and bother everyone
or you don't come at all...
this is literally what JF does
look at this
and tell me how it does not apply for humans
I gave you an example of what they're saying in the text, and you ignored it
because you know
yes or no
⏲️
Subspecies is a valid replacement word for "race"
It sounds mean tho
"When geographically separate populations of a species exhibit recognizable phenotypic differences, biologists may identify these as separate subspecies; a subspecies is a recognized local variant of a species."
yek, see, you have to write 5 mintues to write something to explain away, instead of just answering
this is what I mean
are different types of dogs considered subspecies?