Message from @Banjod
Discord ID: 645462781880958976
you're not reasonable at all
it's how you act
But even then, it's bullshit because journals don't have universal peer review rules in all cases.
don't need to ban,
but browning isn't out of the question
banning is bad optics banjod <:monkaS:299267496668692493>
either you stop coming here and just ignoring every argument you don't like
and bother everyone
or you don't come at all...
this is literally what JF does
look at this
and tell me how it does not apply for humans
I gave you an example of what they're saying in the text, and you ignored it
because you know
yes or no
Subspecies is a valid replacement word for "race"
It sounds mean tho
"When geographically separate populations of a species exhibit recognizable phenotypic differences, biologists may identify these as separate subspecies; a subspecies is a recognized local variant of a species."
yek, see, you have to write 5 mintues to write something to explain away, instead of just answering
this is what I mean
are different types of dogs considered subspecies?
ok, boring conversation anyway..
Anyone have a good recommendation for a good movie?
maybe sci-fi?
Or, more simply said: geographic separation causing noticeable variation means a valid subspeciation
Breeds
like a chuahua and a great dane
yes, that's why we call some mutts..
are these different subspeices
@Rody Le Cid watch porn
@Soyf they parrot talking points from lewonton and gould and others that were made ages ago and have since been debubked
I would, but I'm tired of seeing your sister all the time
so taxonomically we consider dog breed subspecies?
Just looking at subspecies classifications, some are as small as "these two species are identical except in ear shape"
Yek is about to do some mental gymnastics to justify his claim. Watch this.
i thought that wasnt the case