ill support high iq asian immigration, no africans

its extremely simple

Economic benefits are not everything man

and no pajeet either

look, you don't have to concede territory on this guys

They are an abstract benefit in my view

it's like, we _could_ help other people where they are, but there is no guarantee we could if they are here. if history shows anything, it's everyone loses

immigration does not produce economic benefits

speaking in net

as a total

but MUH GDP

<:why:638779720015675405>

the conservitard crys out

At the end of the day, if Whites want to produce an ethnostate, and it works, then I would not be against it.

so you don't even have to say 'well l know it produces economic benefits, but economic benefits aren't everything'

because it actually does not produce economic benefits

we want all of europe

all of it

we want all of the white lands

<:Yes:639977935209627658>

If you want to make the economic arguments for immigration, become a pundit for Fox News aha

we already did have ethnostates, and they already did work

Europe, america canada nz south africa

its not like it has to be 'tested'

Aren't there already benefits to internal immigration?
i.e. labour-to-work optimisation

It's just the low birth rate that is the problem @Nerthulas

_but what is europe_

I haven't really seen much study on this

that is not a problem

<:sargone:576555026722586635>

low birth rates are a positive

did europe consent

?

problem for what? @James Peterson

REED LOCKE

problem for boomers

lol

<:powerful:639994936070242315>

I don't have a problem with it

there are more norwegians than there have ever been

capital is relatively stagnant, land is static