I am open

@James Peterson where do the Bible and science contradict?

God is Jewish

Which is why I don't believe him

lol

@Rogal Dorn The Adam and Eve story contradicts evolution

creation theory

Keto time

it's so glaringly false

@James Peterson argument from motion, cosmic consciousness, digital physics, fine tuning, and etc..

Jesus said he was sent to the worst pos god could find

I am a creationist

Debate me

@James Peterson Adam and Eve are the first of the cosmic priesthood, not first homosapiens. Humanity predates Adam.

@Deleted User Argument: Aboriginals

look at reality, that's uncanny real to be explainable without the divine

Yes god created em

Fine tuning is addressed by multiverse

Read genesis, cities existed during Adam’s time.

Anthropoid principle

Live https://youtu.be/m1gOtaOUAvI

For all you Christmasy gamers

@ℌ𝔬𝔯𝔲𝔰 Islam will defeat (((America))) & (((UK)))

The argument from motion...so what "moved" God? 🤔 And if he is unmoved while everything is moved, isn't that a special pleading?

@fuguer the multiverse might even exist. The antro principle doesn’t address your most of the fine tuning evidence, which reveals you don’t understand the argument.

Fine tuning is asymptotic and therefore a result of reduction of dimensionality from the perspective of the viewer

Wallah habibi

Indians are the people of God

Tbh

@James Peterson artistotle's/aquias' argument from motion:
change is a real feature of the world
change is the actualization of a potential
for a potential to be actualized you need something already actual (principle of causality)
to explain change in the here and now we can't appeal to an infinite series of instrumental causes
such a series must terminate in a mover which is purely actual, ie the prime mover/god

I hope Muslims behead Dawkins

@James Peterson the what made God argument is actually considered by atheists to be on the list of top 5 arguments against god.

It will confirm karma

And Hinduism

The anthropic principle just says that the state you find yourself in can be explained by the past. If you wake up from a daze holding an umbrella and it’s raining that’s not divine providence

they had to retcon some of the lore for Christianity

to be backwards compatible

The anthropic principle addresses all of the fine tuning evidence. If you think it doesn’t you likely don’t understand the anthropic principle

forget the fine tuning argument. that's baby tier

Agreed