Message from @Billy Ray
Discord ID: 672851171916120089
not the same
clearly
One is genetic. One is mathematically.
>semantics
propose another term, then
Besides, can't we use eugenics to raise the average IQ of this hypothetical new american ethnicity?
sorry
400
We're talking about a mathematical expression of the probability that the child of a high IQ bantu also has a high IQ
Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @blanc
> Besides, can't we use eugenics to raise the average IQ of this hypothetical new american ethnicity?
@Big Benif you're smart enough and wise enough to recognise the benefit of eugenics
You're in less need of eugenics than most
Eugenics is never going to happen aways.
It is more likely we will subsidize dysgenics before we do anything eugenic.
It can happen without government enforcement
In certain societies
And we can not take the government over at this point.
I wish I was asymptomatic carrier of coronachan so I could go coof around my city
Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @Ed
Regression to the mean is just a statistical term for quantitative psychologists, who want to improve their sample data.
@Vanessa Cross I am
Yes.
@Vanessa Cross if you unironically were sterilized, I would be fine with it. I would not do the sterilizing by the way.
Become Catholic
> Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @Ed
@BeautyIsEternal
This is bypassing the point that i am trying to make
African Individuals with average IQ(by white standards)
Are less likely to have children who also pass the same threshold
Thereby making it difficult to integrate Africans into white society
In the long term @BeautyIsEternal
@stem have you ever read Henry Harpending paper on the passification of the west. Christian eugeniced the low IQ and offenders. I find what I said having no conflict with my faith and will copy and paste it
@Samuel if you unironically were sterilized, I would be fine with it. I would not do the sterilizing by the way.
@Vanessa Cross also. you think you are funny, you sperg? Nice joke : /
Give me a gun
I'll shoot the sons of bitches
Christian at the time were systematically murdering or banishing their underclass
Which essentially gave them a long term advantage
@Ed I agree with that statement. But I just contend it being called "regression to the mean" as I take quantitative psychology and factor analysis seriously
or all the above statements
Obviously, we should not take blacks in. They will not integrate over time. Yes, I agree.
Fair I might have misused the term
I have talked to this topic with people before.
I do not think we need to label a progression or advancement in terms of genes away from the mean as we do not neeed to label it to the mean.
The term is just of mathematically significance to me.
If we do label a progression from the mean, I would be for a term to the mean.
@Vanessa Cross You are just the most disgusting person, aren't you?
Disgust is a moral objection