Message from @BeautyIsEternal
Discord ID: 672852710487228439
Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @Ed
Regression to the mean is just a statistical term for quantitative psychologists, who want to improve their sample data.
@Vanessa Cross I am
Hail
Yes.
@Vanessa Cross if you unironically were sterilized, I would be fine with it. I would not do the sterilizing by the way.
Become Catholic
> Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @Ed
@BeautyIsEternal
This is bypassing the point that i am trying to make
African Individuals with average IQ(by white standards)
Are less likely to have children who also pass the same threshold
Thereby making it difficult to integrate Africans into white society
In the long term @BeautyIsEternal
@stem have you ever read Henry Harpending paper on the passification of the west. Christian eugeniced the low IQ and offenders. I find what I said having no conflict with my faith and will copy and paste it
@Samuel if you unironically were sterilized, I would be fine with it. I would not do the sterilizing by the way.
@Vanessa Cross also. you think you are funny, you sperg? Nice joke : /
Give me a gun
I'll shoot the sons of bitches
Christian at the time were systematically murdering or banishing their underclass
Which essentially gave them a long term advantage
@Ed I agree with that statement. But I just contend it being called "regression to the mean" as I take quantitative psychology and factor analysis seriously
or all the above statements
Obviously, we should not take blacks in. They will not integrate over time. Yes, I agree.
Fair I might have misused the term
I have talked to this topic with people before.
I do not think we need to label a progression or advancement in terms of genes away from the mean as we do not neeed to label it to the mean.
The term is just of mathematically significance to me.
If we do label a progression from the mean, I would be for a term to the mean.
@Vanessa Cross You are just the most disgusting person, aren't you?
Disgust is a moral objection
Christ was based and red pilled... the "bad people" on earth are doing everything to subvert his message
@BeautyIsEternal We call it a mutation or selection, a diversion from the mean.
Also
Christ was a med
he was not
christ is gods son
God is also a med
just look where people lead in rhinoplasty
they arent in gods image
they dont look like christ
christ was joseph's wife's boyfriend's son
Regardless of all that Christianity was,
It won't be an efficient countermeasure to the subversive forces at play
The new value system has to take into account the faults of the previous value system or it will fail just the same
anyway,
it's safe to say that christ was an illegitimate child, born out of wedlock.
@Dean Harris mutations rates are calculable, so I doubt it is mutation based.
Quantum biology has said that microtubules work in a probabilistic manner, so I would say that it is largely genetic probability than mutations. Even fathers are the age of 35, who pass on 70 mutations only mutate .03% of their genomone, so I hesitate to agree with you.
@BeautyIsEternal I might misundestand, you were askinng for a term to use to describe a person who's genes are disparate from the mean?
@Ed I agree. Though, religions systems are more about truth and epistemology, not one of usefulness. Clearly, Christianity was god at one point and was hijacked.