Message from @troglodytes
Discord ID: 651368165678514186
Seems sane
Kurgan claims he has an IQ of 155
<:big_brained:396156349676781569>
The debate would actually be rather boring... probably won't get beyond the definition stage
This Kurgan has a higher IQ
All religious debates are boring
I disagree that "religious training" is a pre-req for debating religion
from Dyer
Thats like saying I cant be anti flat earth unless i went to flat earth college
But then, Kurgan thinks anyone who rejects Roman Catholicism is a retard... while at the same time rejecting Vatican Two as heresy.
Yeah, Dyer makes a point of trying to bury any debate in advanced philosophy, then says he won because the other guy hasn't studied advanced philosophy to be able to respond to his points...
...it's a tactic alright, but not one that makes for good debate.
***
The Kurgan vs Jay Dyer will be on The Killstream... date yet to be finalised.
the debate with the kurgan has already been set
yes
but the kurgan made this weird backtracking video that wasnt relaly backtracking
so the debate is still on
vox and the kurgan are proabbly going to score a technical win (in their eyes), because they are setting up the debate in a way where only they can win
kurgan and ralph are both friends of vox
yeah, I've watched a handful of Kurgan's videos and he's sucking Vox's cock in every one of them. His life seems to revolve around the world according to Vox Day.
His latest effort...
https://youtu.be/4EddB-Itb7o
His big plan is to form "fraternal groups" to take over after the collapse as warlords...
...the training will comprise of martial arts combined with Catholic Catechism.
---
Agree, the restriction of any debate is always designed to force a draw or cheat a win by making any points that would deliver a blow out-of-bounds.
---
Oh boy... he's saying the Greek myth of the Amazons comes from Brazilian Amazon - so much for his claim of a 155 IQ.
155IQ my ass
<:jennLOL:359497781137768458>
<:pepekek:649611550809653248> <:honkpilled:558686758875824130>
Posieden?
Oh no, he just uses a similar graphic
"I disagree that "religious training" is a pre-req for debating religion" Their debate is about a specific catholic sect not a year old debate Jay and JF had
exactly what you would need study of that religion for
You gotta study it before you're allowed to have arguments about it, because otherwise too many non-religious people may think they are allowed to have arguments as to whether religion is realistic or not
You think god isn't real? Well this professor of godology begs to differ
Check mate atheists
no for wether its real you dont need it
but thats not what the debate is about