Says it in the book of Mormon

<:ohyou2:569616856105877505>

<:dogesunglasses:589578763445207040>

Nono

*space* rape is ok

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

Science is fake news

Shut up bunyip, you’re just mad that I used science to prove you’re gay 😠😠😠😠😠😠

Beep boop beep boop beep boop got my lab coat going to calculate your gaynesss beep boop beep boop bunyip is gay

NOOOO you can't prove I'm gay 😭:sob:😭:sob:

Too bad no one can replicate your results haha! My heterosexuality is affirmed once again

ok

watch this

@Deleted User Beep boop beep boop beep boop got my lab coat going to calculate your gaynesss beep boop beep boop bunyip is gay

This test has yielded the same results. Bunyip is gay.

Bruh

Bro

Wtf

Alright @Deleted User fear not, i shall do the math

One sec

Oof

I crunched the numbers

Youre gay

Sorry bud

😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭 😭

Lord forgive me, a sinner

alright so

which institutions publish those studies and their findings and why is there no standard of being independently reproduced before you can get your findings published and taken seriously?

when wrath says bro: _brur_

Lmaoing at this vision people have of le science and publishing

This is how publishing works:

You send a paper to some journal

Around 3 unpaid people read it and review, rejecting the paper or asking for changes

The changes are done. After 1 or 2 rounds, the paper is published

Longing for the day "peer review" is rightfully referred to as "mob rule".

I feel bad for people with Alfa Romeos now that all I see is this

OH NOOOOOO

Part of the problem with publishing is that single studies aren't ever really supposed to have weight, but when they're published, news media picks it up and reports it as a newly discovered fact.

"Science isn't a religion"
"This just in, the divine revelation of a single 6 man study at UC Berkeley has revealed men prefer to bugger other men. That means gay is natural, take that bigots"

don't be a neotrad