How exactly are they going to prove that the priest both knew who the guy was, and knew that he was doing something illegal?

It's not a matter of it being "enforced", it's a matter of it being attacked in the first place.

The weak links in our particular chain will start to show, especially when modernist and bleeding-heart priests start shopping people.

We need more Christian assasins, TBH

The secularists/atheists/revolutionaries, whatever you want to call them, always engage in rampant assassination in every cultural takeover they've ever done.

As a devout catholic this makes me unhappy

it only works if rulers are offed and we can get power

otherwise, it's terrorism and not tyrannicide

and it's immoral and peccable

its true- even the catholic catechism says this ^

Can't do. Death penalties are inadmissible now. 😏

That's not the only reason.

I'd fight and kill if someone was attacking me or someone I loved. But I would not murdur, not even if the target is extremely retarded.

Same^

But it gets harder and harder not to simply murder commies

Then again they'll eventually kill each other so no need to waste energy

I have converted 6 atheists and one pagan and sadly it was too easy they left Christianity because no one could tell them how God is love if he ordered genocide! does no one not seem to know the canaanites roasted there childeren alive to moloch? or that they practiced cannibalism and sodomy? I am soo angry at the churches for not preaching teh fullness of the truth they all all of the ones I converted literally said that had they been taught these things they would never have left

That is because of Christianity becoming soft

They're teaching everyone that God is all sunshine and rainbows, so people can't reconcile his justness

I am beyond pissed that it was that easy tbh it shouldnt be but all these liberal prots and romans and orthodox I am not even sure I how i feel about them right now'

@󠀂 󠀂 Is it murder if they're guilty though?

@TheImperator important question

It is murder even if they are guilty if they haven't been tried by some sort of court.

That's why the Church had the Inquisition, not the Assassination.

As much as some people get them confused.

Political assassins = extra-judicial killing = sinful

The only time I believe political assassinations would be justified if the rule of law has been positively shattered and we are living in anarchy.

Can’t be extra-judicial is there is no judiciary.

What if the Judiciary is untrustworthy?

Then I would challenge that person to a duel.

If I killed him, it wouldn't be murder, seeing as how he was also trying to kill me.

isn't duelling forbidden by the Church ?

I'd have to look that up.

Dueling is illegal in most nation-states too if I'm not mistaken

We're talking about a scenario where the state is in anarchy and/or the judiciary is untrustworthy.

Set up your own judiciary

:v

That's an option, too.

If it's an anarchy then arm yourself and your family and maybe friendly families, block off sections of your neighborhood and set up an autonomous temporary government

Lay down the law and enforce it

How does the Catholic Church view the American Revolution?