Message from @Byzas
Discord ID: 488322475994775562
Cya
Well, that was fascinating to catch up with.
I've honestly gotten a little bit softer on Miscegenation since embracing the faith.
I mean, I dislike the push European goverments make for subliminally encouraging it, and it certainly shouldn't be encouraged at all in the "diversity is our stength" nonsensical way.
But if it happens, every so often... well.
Guess I've becoming something of a romantic as I've gotten older. <:cathokike:291522267890974721>
"subliminally"
🤣
We should do our best to preserve our kind but what's more important is the faith.
And if you look at history people rise and fall all the time and they usually deserve the fall they get
I'd like my fellow HWYTE MANN to survive but Europe and America are pretty degenerate and only the devout christians deserve to go on
That said, at least here in America, abortion and birth control are way bigger threats than miscegenation
Abortion clinics must, not should, must, be burned to the ground
And condoms should be outlawed
positive and voluntary eugenism is the solution to both of these problems (miscegenation / abortions)
since it would be policies that encourage chastity and a good choice for marriage
Louis XVI of France forbade race-mixing because of the presence of slaves etc, and he was a good Christian
Eugenics are fucked, it's not man's place to control that kind of thing, as much as I'd like to avoid downie brownies
nah, eugenics are not inherently bad and they can be fully compatible with Christian morals when not centered around abortion/sterilization/euthanasia but rather around having high morals + chosing a partner that will be the most "compatible" genetically speaking
marriage is cancer when it is the result of passionate love, we have to re-rationalize it a bit
I'm confident you won't have one side of the coin without the other
Christianity was the first "culture" to approve of marriage for love, tbh
love is not a passion
Obviously people confuse their lust for love and that's despicable
it was what we had in medieval times : to each its kind, peasants with peasants, nobles with nobles, and usually the nobilty and the clerics could target some high-potential kid from another rank in order to make him into nobilty or priesthood
there was a very sane genetic selection during the Middle Ages, and it was centered around Christian morals
As much as I'd love to see aristocracy restored, good luck with that, the last guy I can think of that tried that was our boy Corneliu and they shot him and his men in a field
Hitler did it better
there was some good initiatives in France too
we had a research center led by Alexis Carrel
nobel doctor that converted to Catholicism because he witnessed a miracle in Lourdes
I'm not aware of Adolf trying any restoration of aristocracy
it was a hugely hierarchichal society
with a lot of plasticity between the different "classes"
even if it was not called an aristocracy, you just have to look at the quality of their intellectual, military and industrial elite and what they produced
it was perhaps the beginning of a new aristocracy
without the problems of the impermeability of the good old system of classes we had in the M-A
It is pretty frustrating that most of the nationalist movements failed
yep
Honestly I'd prefer if my descendants completely absorb into the local population of whereever I live
Which is why I will make sure me or my kids never move to Africa or any other negro nation
I'd happily move to and assimilate to a better country than burgerland
New Rhodesia, Georgia, Russia, etc
Georgians are good people
Orthodox nation of proud warriors