Message from @Based Chav
Discord ID: 488307485615063052
They saw what you wrote about negroes
Epic
He’s a race mixing meet
Neet
I'm not so heavily against race mixing personally; for me it is about the culture
In the context of a country like South Korea in the example I provided it was wrong
That guy knew all too well what happens to dark skin kids in school
Endless bullying
And chose to race mix with a negro
But I'm honestly more American than Korean; I understand Asian American is an option but I have never met Asians I am compatible with
I feel a duty to procreate within a union blessed by God
Since I am the only son
Idk what I should do :/
Anyways gtg because I wagecuck for 16hrs tomorrow
Good night everyone
Cya
Well, that was fascinating to catch up with.
I've honestly gotten a little bit softer on Miscegenation since embracing the faith.
I mean, I dislike the push European goverments make for subliminally encouraging it, and it certainly shouldn't be encouraged at all in the "diversity is our stength" nonsensical way.
Guess I've becoming something of a romantic as I've gotten older. <:cathokike:291522267890974721>
"subliminally"
🤣
We should do our best to preserve our kind but what's more important is the faith.
And if you look at history people rise and fall all the time and they usually deserve the fall they get
I'd like my fellow HWYTE MANN to survive but Europe and America are pretty degenerate and only the devout christians deserve to go on
That said, at least here in America, abortion and birth control are way bigger threats than miscegenation
Abortion clinics must, not should, must, be burned to the ground
And condoms should be outlawed
positive and voluntary eugenism is the solution to both of these problems (miscegenation / abortions)
since it would be policies that encourage chastity and a good choice for marriage
Louis XVI of France forbade race-mixing because of the presence of slaves etc, and he was a good Christian
Eugenics are fucked, it's not man's place to control that kind of thing, as much as I'd like to avoid downie brownies
nah, eugenics are not inherently bad and they can be fully compatible with Christian morals when not centered around abortion/sterilization/euthanasia but rather around having high morals + chosing a partner that will be the most "compatible" genetically speaking
marriage is cancer when it is the result of passionate love, we have to re-rationalize it a bit
I'm confident you won't have one side of the coin without the other
Christianity was the first "culture" to approve of marriage for love, tbh
love is not a passion
Obviously people confuse their lust for love and that's despicable
And they usually divorce or something
it was what we had in medieval times : to each its kind, peasants with peasants, nobles with nobles, and usually the nobilty and the clerics could target some high-potential kid from another rank in order to make him into nobilty or priesthood
there was a very sane genetic selection during the Middle Ages, and it was centered around Christian morals
As much as I'd love to see aristocracy restored, good luck with that, the last guy I can think of that tried that was our boy Corneliu and they shot him and his men in a field
Hitler did it better