Did Mozambique finally get his supporter role?

@Mozalbete ⳩

@Ironclad It seems that something prevents the bot from applying the role

Had an Eastern Rite priest sing the Gospel at the Missa Solemnis yesterday.

Lowest voice I’ve ever heard.

👌

Can somebody explain, rather extensively, the recent troubles in the Orthodox Church regarding the autocephaly in Ukraine?

Your best bet is to research it on your own

Essentially the Greek church is stepping on toes and appointing its own people to that church or rather creating another church distinct from the Russian church which has rightful autonomy over Ukraine

how do you orthobros explain the palamite transition since it's a huge turning point in the way theology is approached ?

especially since you're very anti-change and anti-thomist (which is difficult to understand since it's wonderfully traditional)

😦

Not a theologian or expert in any measure, but thomism came after the split, no?

Yeah, quite a while afterwards.

Seems a bit silly to discredit the entire school of thought over the matter, though.

Thomism is pretty solid.

>thomism
>traditional
yeah, for the modern west sure

After eight hundred years, yes.

Well it's not traditional for the orthodox faith

And palamas is

What's the difference? Sorry, I honestly don't know.

>Thomism
>Not Aristotelian
>Not traditional.

Smuganimegirl.jpg

antianimecrusader.jpg

Palamas refuted some things used in thomism such as absolute divine simplicity and affirmed the essence energies distinction

Ah. That makes things... a little clearer.

What was his assertion in place of divine simplicity?

explain to me Enoch how thomism is less traditional than palamism

Because "palamism" isn't a philosophical/theological school, it's small o orthodox theology

Divine simplicity is real, but not thomistic absolute divine simplicity that thinks distinction is division @Based Chav

https://www.facebook.com/sendas.spix/videos/554470035008606/?__xts__[0]=68.ARByQUjxG1MUwJspA_I7GX9tGd3gdqPvd1m7f_UE1EYN8RnJa9MNSGIjDxTjfQF_2RI3fd__HC3UnK5Y7Hv5cbMZ-IrhLOQv0RMEOdJc8GDRiTE22AJthz3M0xJkoFjEOZCwK2hFu9aksxB3yNMEX9YWrtfjPvO-4sXjpMT3fX9TrQc0AUSe4rJNY1JjlmAD80EMXC7kjRJ3XZ08GSO7S5f_pUE58uhDdBNhcELG&__tn__=H-R

Enoch, where does this distinction exist before Palamas (can you quote councils or Father's sayings on that ?) ?

I personally cannot, but I've met those who have quoted at least one ecumenical council and church father, I believe Mr Dyer covers this in one of his lectures on the subject

I'll look onto that, thanks

Are cigarettes for degenerates

Yes.

Fuck.

I gues difference is wether it is an addiction or not

Well, all smoking inevitably leads to addiction.

Cigarettes are degenerate
Cigars can be classy
Pipes are classy

Yes, that's how I would classify it.

But I've promised my dad never to smoke, and I intend to hold to that promise.