Message from @MaxMartinSkaleniu SWEDEN

Discord ID: 491637234320146433


2018-09-16 15:01:33 UTC  

especially since you're very anti-change and anti-thomist (which is difficult to understand since it's wonderfully traditional)

2018-09-18 09:54:57 UTC  

๐Ÿ˜ฆ

2018-09-18 13:18:44 UTC  

Not a theologian or expert in any measure, but thomism came after the split, no?

2018-09-18 13:36:51 UTC  

Yeah, quite a while afterwards.

2018-09-18 13:37:12 UTC  

Seems a bit silly to discredit the entire school of thought over the matter, though.

2018-09-18 13:37:23 UTC  

Thomism is pretty solid.

2018-09-18 13:43:03 UTC  

>thomism
>traditional
yeah, for the modern west sure

2018-09-18 13:43:32 UTC  

After eight hundred years, yes.

2018-09-18 13:44:08 UTC  

Well it's not traditional for the orthodox faith

2018-09-18 13:44:14 UTC  

And palamas is

2018-09-18 13:44:36 UTC  

What's the difference? Sorry, I honestly don't know.

2018-09-18 13:48:48 UTC  

>Thomism
>Not Aristotelian
>Not traditional.

2018-09-18 13:48:59 UTC  

Smuganimegirl.jpg

2018-09-18 13:49:44 UTC  

antianimecrusader.jpg

2018-09-18 13:50:19 UTC  

Palamas refuted some things used in thomism such as absolute divine simplicity and affirmed the essence energies distinction

2018-09-18 13:50:59 UTC  

Ah. That makes things... a little clearer.

2018-09-18 13:57:51 UTC  

What was his assertion in place of divine simplicity?

2018-09-18 13:59:07 UTC  

explain to me Enoch how thomism is less traditional than palamism

2018-09-18 15:14:48 UTC  

Because "palamism" isn't a philosophical/theological school, it's small o orthodox theology

2018-09-18 15:15:24 UTC  

Divine simplicity is real, but not thomistic absolute divine simplicity that thinks distinction is division @Based Chav

2018-09-18 15:50:50 UTC  

https://www.facebook.com/sendas.spix/videos/554470035008606/?__xts__[0]=68.ARByQUjxG1MUwJspA_I7GX9tGd3gdqPvd1m7f_UE1EYN8RnJa9MNSGIjDxTjfQF_2RI3fd__HC3UnK5Y7Hv5cbMZ-IrhLOQv0RMEOdJc8GDRiTE22AJthz3M0xJkoFjEOZCwK2hFu9aksxB3yNMEX9YWrtfjPvO-4sXjpMT3fX9TrQc0AUSe4rJNY1JjlmAD80EMXC7kjRJ3XZ08GSO7S5f_pUE58uhDdBNhcELG&__tn__=H-R

2018-09-18 15:52:27 UTC  

Enoch, where does this distinction exist before Palamas (can you quote councils or Father's sayings on that ?) ?

2018-09-18 15:53:34 UTC  

I personally cannot, but I've met those who have quoted at least one ecumenical council and church father, I believe Mr Dyer covers this in one of his lectures on the subject

2018-09-18 15:54:27 UTC  

I'll look onto that, thanks

2018-09-19 05:17:59 UTC  

Are cigarettes for degenerates

2018-09-19 05:20:04 UTC  

Yes.

2018-09-19 05:30:27 UTC  

Fuck.

2018-09-19 05:31:05 UTC  

I gues difference is wether it is an addiction or not

2018-09-19 05:36:07 UTC  

Well, all smoking inevitably leads to addiction.

2018-09-19 12:09:43 UTC  

Cigarettes are degenerate
Cigars can be classy
Pipes are classy

2018-09-19 13:10:37 UTC  

Yes, that's how I would classify it.

2018-09-19 13:10:52 UTC  

But I've promised my dad never to smoke, and I intend to hold to that promise.

2018-09-19 13:17:04 UTC  

All of it the same filth, just different degrees of pretentiousness

2018-09-19 16:47:50 UTC  

I bet you prefer grape juice communion too

2018-09-19 16:50:02 UTC  

Hi

2018-09-19 16:59:32 UTC  

Evening.

2018-09-19 20:56:53 UTC  

I will have lunch with the local exorcist here in Seville this Saturday

2018-09-19 22:04:11 UTC  

Why though?

2018-09-19 23:08:08 UTC  

:O

2018-09-20 00:43:32 UTC  

Cigars and pipes can be classy, but theyโ€™re being hijacked by these stupid incels and pseudo-gentlemen.

2018-09-20 00:43:50 UTC  

Cigars, yes, pipes, not so much.