So not worth joining

Sand monkys

@Based Chav

What the

They're self-righteous fucking arseholes.

I asked a question and they've just gone into self-aggrandizing hooting and "LOL UR BIBLE SAYS THIS".

Remind them Quran says sun comes out of a mud puddle

I'm just not bothering, theyre getting on my nerves.

And the Anglo"Catholic" has already flared my temper enough.

Lol why

When talking against islam to muslims, you just mention that

There is literally no reason to believe Muhammed was a prophet. He checks EVERY SINGLE MARK of a false prophet. He led 15 military campaigns, keeping for him 1/5 of the spoils of war. He did nothing but proclaim himself important, completely contradicted former prophets, was a pedophile warlord who created a harem for himself that contradicted his own rules, was illiterate about theology and christianity, and had no prophecies or miracles

Do not argue about the Trinity

Do not argue about theology

Hmm. Too late for that.

Do not let them change the discussion about non-muslim things

Clearly I dun goofed

Still pricks, though.

Plus he drove people into believing based off earthly desires

Lack of sexual morality, polygamy and promise of 72 virgins

He just ripped off Christians and jews lol

More than you think

There is actually a trusty hadith that describes

How Muhammed tried to justify how he paid christians and jews less

By using the parable of the workers about the Kingdom of God

Kek.

This parable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Workers_in_the_Vineyard

He used the parable to try to justify he could pay the workers whatever he wanted lmao

looking for it. Had it stored in another computer, I believe

Here

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/37/8

Yeah, their faith has no basis

You gotta Google the titty thing

It's funny as hell

You mean this?

https://sunnah.com/muslim/17/30

There is AN ENTIRE BOOK about suckling in the oldest compilation of islamic laws: https://sunnah.com/malik/30

However, don't abuse its quotes because it also mentions that "Suckling is only while the child is in the cradle. If not, it does not cause flesh and blood relations"

There are several hillariously degenerate hadith about that, actually

Apart from the short one I mentioned earlier